• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About

Radio America Online News Bureau

‘That’s A Lunatic Idea’

January 30, 2013 by GregC

Chuck Hagel’s views on everything from Israel to Iran to nuclear weapons disqualify him from leading America’s armed forces, according to a Reagan administration Pentagon official and a growing group of retired generals and admirals.

The latest point of controversy for Hagel is his support for continued reduction of American nuclear weapons and even their total elimination – regardless of whether Russia charts the same course.

Confirmation hearings for Hagel will be held Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The Hagel nomination was always going to be a rocky one, especially among his fellow Republicans.  However, his apparent acceptance among Democrats supportive of Israel and at least one Republican suggests Hagel is likely to be confirmed.

Frank Gaffney is president at the Center for Security Policy and was an assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration.  He says the fight against the Hagel nomination must persist because of the dangers he presents to America’s national security and America’s most decorated warriors are an important part of the debate.

“It’s often the case that you’ll have those who have served in uniform but who are now out of uniform weighing in on national security issues,” said Gaffney.  ” In this case we were very pleased with 14 senior general and flag officers who came together to advise the Senate from their perspective as professional military men that, in their judgment Chuck Hagel should not be the next secretary of defense.  I couldn’t agree more with them.”

The common defense of any controversial cabinet choice by a president is that the president should be allowed to surround himself with the advisers he prefers.  Gaffney says that courtesy only extends so far.

“The issue is not simply a disagreement about policy direction.  It’s an appreciation that, historically, that those in the Pentagon have kind of been an anchor to windward as the Navy might say, a break on some of the worst impulses of presidents like Barack Obama,” said Gaffney, who described Obama’s approach to foreign policy as cavalier and ideological for his efforts to “undermine” Israel, “hollow out the military” and “empower” Iran.

“In Chuck Hagel, we will clearly not have that kind of break on this president’s worst instincts,” said Gaffney.

As for Hagel’s views on nuclear weapons, Gaffney says the goal of eliminating our nuclear stockpile is foolhardy but is perfectly in line with the Obama agenda.

“There’s no question President Obama has declared he thinks it should be our policy to rid the world of nuclear weapons.  I happen to believe that’s a lunatic idea, completely unachievable and one that will, even if successful and I don’t see how it could be, make the world more likely to be in the throes of violence and war rather than less,” said Gaffney.

“Chuck Hagel has, in fact, embraced this Global Zero idea.  He has fully associated himself with it,” said Gaffney.

Given a 10-seat Democratic majority in the Senate and at least one GOP member ready to back his former colleague, do opponents still have a shot at sinking this nomination?

“There is a lot of information that I think would cause most members of the Senate to have real pause about this nomination,” said Gaffney.  “This nominee has made it abundantly clear for a very long time his animus toward Israel and his willingness to engage its enemies and ours from Hamas and Hezbollah to Iran.”

Ultimately, Gaffney says rigorous questioning and fair media coverage are critical to any efforts to derail the nomination.

“We’re going to see an airing of many of these issues in the course of this hearing.  My guess is there will be senators who haven’t decided as of now who may be influenced by the outcome of that, assuming we get a fair shake from the press,” said Gaffney.

“What we’ve sadly seen too much of, most especially during the last campaign is the press sort of tending to suppress information that would be unhelpful to this president but very material to the national security interests of the people.  I hope that won’t be the case in this instance,” said Gaffney.

Standard Podcast [ 8:58 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: Podcasts

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent

  • GOP Senate Prospects, Cable News Debate Drama, Lightfoot Fails Upward
  • Senate’s Student Loan Rebuke, ‘No Plan’ on China, Hunter’s Absurd Defense
  • Manchin’s Dismal Polling, Trump-DeSantis Surrogate Wars, Christie Crashes the Party
  • Debt Ceiling Deal, EU vs. Twitter, Neuralink’s Promise vs. Peril
  • A Memorial Day Special

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in