On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court ruled 6-1 in favor of upholding the constitutional amendment defining marriage in the Golden State as the union of one man and one woman – which was approved by voters in November. So how big of a win is this for traditional marriage? What does it mean for the national marriage debate? Are gay marriage advocates gaining much traction in their effort to change the definition again in the 2010 elections? And why did the court also allow the 18,000 existing gay marriages to remain legal? We ask Matt Staver, founder and president of Liberty Counsel. He also argued the case for traditional marriage before the California Supreme Court in 2008.
