The New York Times is at it again. After blowing the cover on programs to eavesdrop on terrorists and starve them financially, the TImes is now going public with a 2004 policy approving surgical military strikes anywhere al qaeda or another high value target exists in the War on Terror. How should we react to the Times decision to go with this story? How tough is it to find the government leak? And why could the lives of our military be at greater risk because of this story being published? We ask Human Events Editor Jed Babbin, a former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense.
