Two weeks ago, a federal judge in California declared a state constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man and one woman as unconstitutional. Last week, the same judge announced gay ‘marriages’ would resume in California on August 18. Now, an appeals court says they will not resume until this case runs its course. So how significant is this? Is this an indication of how the court may decide the actual appeal? How would life change badly for everyone if gay marriage were legalized? And why is it wrong to call the traditional definition of marriage as a ban on gay marriage? We ask Robert Knight, senior fellow at the American Civil Rights Union and Washington correspondent for Coral Ridge Ministries.