• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About

Radio America Online News Bureau

Union Dues Battle Reaches Supremes Again

February 26, 2018 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/2-26-mix-blog.mp3

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether labor unions can force non-members to pay dues when they hold public sector jobs, and the upcoming verdict may have a major impact on organized labor going forward.

And one leading expert says if unions cannot count on compulsory dues, their next plan may be to get it from the taxpayers.

On Monday, justices heard the case of Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, or AFSCME.  Mark Janus is an employee with the Illinois Department of Public Health.  He is not a member of AFSCME, but $50 is still taken out of his paycheck each month in union dues.

AFSCME contends that the collective bargaining it does on behalf of public sector employees ends up benefiting all workers, thus collecting $50 per month from people like Janus is reasonable.

National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation President Mark Mix says organized labor’s argument is full of holes.

“The fact that the unions have positioned themselves as the exclusive bargaining agent and the monopoly voice of all workers in the public sector is really the issue.  This is the fundamental problem and the injustice of this particular situation.  The unions say that everything they do benefits everybody they come in contact with.  That’s just not true.

“So the idea is that Mark Janus, our client who we represented at the Supreme Court, is basically saying that what they’re doing in some cases hurts him.  In some cases it’s arguable that it doesn’t help him.  In some cases it probably does.  But the bottom line is that he would lose his job if he did not pay these fees to the union,” said Mix.

It’s the compulsory policy aimed at non-members that Mix believes is unconstitutional.

“In order to work for his government and have a voice, he’s got to pay a private organization for that privilege.  We believe that it all should be voluntary.  If the union’s doing great work and they’re providing all these great benefits, then workers will join them voluntarily and that’s the way it should work,” said Mix.

Mix says organized labor often positions itself as looking out for the working class and middle class employees, but he alleges the reality is just the opposite.

“If Mark Janus wins this case, there’s nothing that stops any individual from joining a union.  It won’t prohibit anything.  It just simply gives individual workers the choice, and really, when you boil this out that’s what this is.  It’s a battle, literally, between union officials and the rank-and-file workers they claim to represent

“What they’re saying is, ‘If you give these workers a choice…they may decide to do something different, and that’s really the fundamental issue at the bottom of this case.  Union official are worried that if workers are given the choice, they may not choose to support them financially,” said Mix.

National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Staff Attorney William Messenger argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of Janus.  Mix says Messenger was pleased with the way oral arguments went Monday, and he also highlighted how the various justices approached the discussion.

“In the last five years they have asked and talked about this issue, so they were well-informed,” said Mix, noting that the high court heard very similar cases in 2012, 2014, and 2016.  The 2016 case deadlocked at 4-4 due to the death of Justice Scalia.

“Justice Kennedy was pretty animated and interested in this case.  The first amendment is really the ultimate question here.  Justice Thomas did not ask a question.  Justice Gorsuch did not ask a question.  Roberts had a few, Alito had a couple, and Sotomayor and Kagan led the charge for the other side,” said Mix.

Gorsuch not asking a question leaves some mystery as to the final verdict, since the other eight justices are on the record with their views.  While not hazarding a guess as to how the court will rule, Mix says he “hopes the fundamental argument of free speech will hold the day.”

If his side wins, Mix says unions will quickly start looking for other sources of revenue and in left-leaning states that money might come from the taxpayers.

“They’re trying to convince legislatures to give them the authority to collect money from taxpayers if they lose the Janus case.  We’re seeing things pop in New York, in California, in Washington state, and Hawaii.  They’re actually going to ask the taxpayers to pay the fees they can no longer collect from non-members if we win this case, said Mix.

He suspects that road will also wind up a dead end.

“I think that gets them deeper into the hole as opposed to providing solutions for them.  They may win on the short term by getting taxpayers to fund it, but I think once taxpayers find out they’re paying a private organization taxpayer money to do the work they’re doing, I think that will be another problem for organized labor down the road,” said Mix.

Mix says a far better reaction would be for unions to shape up and show non-members there is great value in paying fees for ongoing representation in collective bargaining and other areas.

A ruling on Janus v. AFSCME is expected before the end of June.

Standard Podcast [ 8:44 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: AFSCME, Mark Janus, news, organized labor, Supreme Court, taxes

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent

  • Big GOP Edge on Economy, Iran’s U.S. Infiltration, Electoral College Unpopular
  • Dallas Mayor Joins GOP, Partisan Divide on Free Speech, Canada Honors a Nazi
  • Menendez Indicted, McCormick’s Clear Path, Bipartisan Dress Code Demands
  • Dems Face Migrant Reality, GOP’s Avoidable Losses, Gold Bar Bribery?
  • Lefty Donors Dwindling, Plastic Bottle Ban, Senate Doesn’t Suit Fetterman

Archives

  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in