Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud President Trump’s strong defense of the value of Western civilization in his speech in Poland Wednesday. They also express disappointment in comments made by Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey conceding Republicans failed to prepare a healthcare repeal and replace bill because they didn’t believe Trump would win the election. Finally, they decry New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio for protesting President Trump in Germany in the midst of ongoing crises in his city.
News & Politics
Trump Urges West to Cherish Values that Made it Strong
President Trump hailed Poland as a great success of western civilization, on Friday, holding up the eastern European ally as a model of how a commitment to faith and freedom can overcome great challenges and oppression.
In the speech, Trump urged other western nations to follow in Poland’s footsteps and embrace the heritage that made the West great.
“Through four decades of communist rule, Poland and the other captive nations of Europe endured a brutal campaign to demolish freedom, your faith, your laws, your history, your identity — indeed the very essence of your culture and your humanity. Yet, through it all, you never lost that spirit. Your oppressors tried to break you, but Poland could not be broken,” said Trump.
Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation Chairman Lee Edwards says steering the West back to a position of championing its values was hugely important.
“The United States are Poland are coming together and sending a very clear signal to the rest of Europe. ‘Let’s remember where we came from, what has made us great and powerful, making the West an invaluable part of history over the last 1,000 years. Let’s not cast that all aside and get caught up in bureaucracy,'” said Edwards, who is also a scholar in conservative thought at the Heritage Foundation.
He says Poland’s remarkable resilience against the scourges of fascism and communism – among many other challenges over the centuries – is a testament to it’s fidelity to western values.
“Poland proves it is possible to be a people of faith and a people of independence and to do well economically,” said Edwards.
Trump noted that western civilization is under siege from within and without, starting with radical Islam.
We are confronted by another oppressive ideology — one that seeks to export terrorism and extremism all around the globe. America and Europe have suffered one terror attack after another. We’re going to get it to stop,” said Trump. “We are fighting hard against radical Islamic terrorism, and we will prevail. We cannot accept those who reject our values and who use hatred to justify violence against the innocent.”
Edwards says it’s an ideological battle the Polish people know well.
“Just as we were able to defeat communism, so too can we defeat radical Islam if we come together, if we pull together, if we work together, if we are united by a common faith and a common commitment to democracy and to liberal ideas – to those basic ideas of free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion,” said Edwards.
Trump also noted the crushing growth of government.
“[O]n both sides of the Atlantic, our citizens are confronted by yet another danger — one firmly within our control. This danger is invisible to some but familiar to the Poles: the steady creep of government bureaucracy that drains the vitality and wealth of the people. The West became great not because of paperwork and regulations but because people were allowed to chase their dreams and pursue their destinies,” said Trump.
And he extolled the value of faith and family in the rise of the West and as a vital key to its future.
“We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive,” said Trump.
Edwards says the message was perfectly clear and critical for Europe to hear at a time when cultures are changing and faith plays a smaller and smaller role in society.
“What Mr. Trump was trying to do was say, ‘Look, let’s go back to the tried and to the true, to those values which did bring us together, did unite us, made us a strong continent and a strong West,” said Edwards.
Food Stamp Flux
Food stamp rolls are dropping as some states begin instituting work programs. According to Fox News, states such as Maine, Kansas, and Georgia are seeing a significant drop in welfare users as they require adults to seek jobs or work training in exchange for staying in the food stamp programs. A 19-96 welfare reform bill instituted work requirements, but the Obama administration waived those rules, a move resulting in a rapid growth of welfare dependents. In 20-14, Maine governor Paul Le Paige required all able-bodied adults to find work or perform community service, a ruling resulting in a 14 point 5 percent decline in food stamp participation across the state. This model is being used by lawmakers in Ohio and Utah. Their bill calls for welfare use time limits. ~ Sarah Schutte
‘They Need to Know We Mean Business’
The successful North Korean test of an intercontinental ballistic missile proves the U.S. must be ready to do whatever it takes – even readiness to use nuclear weapons – to prevent Kim Jong-Un from launching a nuclear attack on our nation or one of our allies in the region, according to retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Tom McInerney.
Gen. McInerney spent 35 years in uniform upon graduation from the United States Military Academy. He rose to vice commander of U.S. Air Forces Europe and served as vice chief of staff, the number three position in the Air Force.
He says North Korea’s successful test of an intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM, on Monday raises the stakes in this standoff to a whole new level.
“He is a man who is unstable enough that if he ever got a nuclear ICBM that could reach the United States, that we must fully respect that and understand it. It is unacceptable to us as Americans that we could have North Korea being able to put U.S. cities at risk,” said McInerney.
McInerney is advocating a multi-pronged approach to confronting North Korea that he hopes won’t require military force. However, he says our current posture is untenable and says we cannot rely on our existing missile defense technology to protect us.
“We are at risk,” said McInerney. “That’s all I can say. We are at risk.”
McInerney urges the Trump administration to start with an aggressive diplomatic and economic campaign to force Kim Jong-un into line.
“Number one, increase the diplomatic pressure on China and Russia by the global community, starting this Friday during President Trump’s visit to Germany,” said McInerney. “Next, we’ve got to increase the economic sanctions on China and Russia and other countries that are doing business with North Korea, and I mean very tough sanctions,” said McInerney.
He also wants to see the creation of a NATO-like organization in the Pacific, whereby the U.S. could partner with the likes of South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, and the Philippines in putting pressure on Pyongyang.
The general says North Korea’s increased belligerence is due in part to President Obama’s lack of action with respect to missile defense, sanctions, or tough diplomacy.
“Clearly, the Obama administration was not interested in pursuing an aggressive missile defense capability, as he was not interested in getting the North Koreans to slow their program down. So we have not had much help in this dangerous area for the last eight years,” said McInerney.
McInerney is confident that aggressive sanctions can succeed against North Korea and China, which helped to facilitate Monday’s ICBM launch. But he says leadership also requires a significant buildup in the event peaceful efforts fail.
He foresees the need for a multi-faceted buildup.
“First, we’ve got to build up the forces in [the western Pacific] to include more air power, to include our latest aircraft – the F-22’s, F-35’s, B-2 stealth aircraft,” said McInerney, who also wants to see accelerated production of massive munitions like the Mother of All Bombs, or MOAB, and the 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, and cruise missiles.
“We need to build up the Marine amphibious forces in the western Pacific out around Okinawa. We need to build up some of the ground forces,” he added, noting that South Korea’s competent ground troops would minimize the need for U.S. troops on the peninsula.
McInerney is also pleading with South Korea to allow the implementation of the THAAD missile defense program to proceed. Currently, the South Korean government is holding up the effort while waiting for an environmental review.
“And we’ve got to build up our Naval forces to include at least two carriers. I believe we need three, as well as both missile defense forces…as well as cruise missile capabilities,” said McInerney.
But he goes a step farther in urging the military to be ready for the nuclear option, including the staging of personnel in Japan and South Korea and readying nuke-carrying bombers in Guam. He also urges the U.S. to allow allies in the region of have access to nukes.
McInerney says the U.S. knows exactly where all the critical military sites are in North Korea and just one B-2 bomber run with conventional weapons could have a devastating impact.
“One B-2 can drop 80 500-pound bombs with GPS guidance and take out 80 of those artillery sites right away. A MOAB could knock out 50 artillery sites at once perhaps,” said McInerney.
Again, McInerney believes military action can be avoided but he says being ready for a fight is prudent.
“They need to know we mean business and if we have to, we will use the full conventional and nuclear retaliatory capabilities of the United States against this threat,” said McInerney.
Illegal Immigration Plummets, Illinois Bungles Budget, CNN’s Reddit Wrath
Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America discuss rapidly dropping rates in illegal immigration across the southern border. They also reproach Illinois state representatives – especially Republicans – for agreeing to tax hikes instead of dealing with major fiscal problems. And they question CNN’s decision to intimidate an anonymous Reddit user over the controversial GIF President Trump re-tweeted on Sunday. To finish off the day, they criticize the History Channel for concluding what happened to Amelia Earhart based largely on one photograph.
‘All the Wrong Moves in the Obamacare Direction’
A key member of the House Freedom Caucus says the Senate health care bill drifts too far towards the existing framework and that the smartest approach would be to repeal Obamacare and then get to work on a replacement, although he does not expect GOP leaders to choose that path.
Rep. Dave Brat, R-Virginia, taught economics for 20 years before pulling off a stunning defeat of then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a 2014 Republican primary. He could not support the Senate bill unveiled by leaders last week.
“The original bill coming out of the Senate kind of made all the wrong moves in the Obamacare direction, which is shocking,” said Brat.
“It’s not just about adding more coverage or helping more people. That’s the way most people are thinking about this. What I think people lost track of is Economics 101. Obamacare is in the ditch because of its own economic logic,” said Brat.
He says lawmakers on both sides struggle to see the big picture.
“That Obamacare logic was just about 100 percent attention paid to coverage and no attention paid to the price of health care. As a result, people were covered with gold-plated health insurance policies, but no one could afford health coverage,” said Brat.
With Senate Republicans now unable to move their own bill, Brat enthusiastically endorses the suggestion of Sens. Rand Paul, R-Kent., and Ben Sasse, R-Neb., to repeal Obamacare now and then get to work on a replacement that can pass.
“The rational politics would have been, initially, to repeal Obamacare, which all of those senators voted for when it didn’t count. They all voted for the 2015 package to repeal Obamacare,” said Brat.
He says that’s exactly what Republican voters expected after the 2016 elections, but they aren’t getting it.
“When you vote 50 times to repeal and then you tell the American people you’re going to repeal and then you end up very close to Obamacare logic. That is not good for the Republican brand,” said Brat.
Brat is confident that if repeal came first, there would be plenty of interest across the spectrum in getting on board with the replacement bill.
“Then you have the leverage to work with the Democrats. There’s no shortage of people who want to add programs in D.C. in the swamp, right? So you first repeal and then the floodgates are open to add. You can get as many votes as you want from any politician to say yes. Politicians love to say yes. That would have been a brilliant move back in January,” he said.
So will House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell embrace that idea now that a comprehensive bill is flailing in the Senate? Brat is not holding his breath.
“I went to seminary so I’ll be praying for it, but I’m doubtful. That would be too good of news. I don’t think we’ve got a big enough spine to carry that off,” said Brat.
But why? Republicans scored decisive wins in three separate election cycles, due in large part to their promises to repeal Obamacare. So why aren’t they following through?
Brat sees three key reasons: keeping the special interests happy, the effort to protect vulnerable Senate incumbents from unpopular votes, and a relentlessly hostile media.
“Up in D.C., you’ve got to appease the swamp, so there’s all sorts of moneyed special interests you have to appease, ” said Brat, noting that the insurance companies love what the Senate GOP produced. “Then if you’re in tough seats, you’ve got to try to support those tough seats.”
Brat says the influence of the major insurance companies is a big problem, one that James Madison and Adam Smith warned against long ago.
“Both of them had the exact same logic. You want a large number of small competitors duking it out in this country. We’ve lost that. That’s the American way. Instead, we’ve got a few huge oligopolies running from D.C., which the elites can put their thumb down on and that’s why the American person is getting hammered right now,” said Brat.
As for the media, Brat says the avalanche of false, negative coverage is tough for many members to weather.
“After we passed the House bill, the mainstream media repeated misinformation and fake news for the next week. It was one simple line: House bill gets rid of pre-existing conditions. Everybody with pre-existing conditions is on their own and there’s going to be death in the streets,” said Brat.
“It is daunting to have confidence in the people back home, that they can see through that message when that’s all you see as a politician is that mainstream media. CNN, New York Times, Washington Post: House guts, destroys obliterates – all these crazy words. Then they say, ‘Politicians, you guys have to be more civil,’ as they lambaste us with falsehoods constantly,” said Brat.
One of the main reasons Brat opposes the Senate bill is because it fails to deal with what he sees as the fatally flawed framework of Obamacare.
“At least the House package had a little bit of room to negotiate some of the regulations and the regulations are Obamacare. If you don’t get rid of the Obamacare regulations, a young person cannot go out and buy a catastrophic package out of college, so they’re left with a gold-plated plan with a $2,000-$3,000 deductible. And I don’t know a lot of college grads with two or three grand in their pocket,” said Brat.
He is imploring his fellow Republicans to proceed on the principles they constantly espouse about the success of the free market.
“If you believe in free markets and the standard American package of free enterprise, etc., that will deliver the goods. Everybody knows these eye surgeries that started out at $6,000 per eye are down to $450 per eye to get your Tiger Woods eye surgery,” said Brat.
“That’s what the market can do if you let it alone. If you let the government intervene, you end up with Medicare, which is insolvent in 2034. You end up with Social Security, which is insolvent for the kids in 2034. $20 trillion in debt, $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities to those major programs, and we’re going to add more government,” said Brat.
Gettysburg Reenactment Rumors
Gettysburg Pennsylvania authorities are on edge over rumors claiming the leftist group Antifa may cause problems at this weekend’s battle reenactment. According to Fox News, some fear the group may cause damage to gravestones and even burn a Confederate flag. While peaceful protests are legal, such action on Antifa’s part will not be tolerated. While the Central Pennsylvania Antifa group denies the rumors, United States park police are taking the reports seriously. The reenactment is highly attended, and authorities are preparing for any incidents that may arise.
‘We Have to Be Watching Out for Regular Americans’
A new government report estimates that 1.4 million illegal immigrants are using the stolen Social Security numbers of Americans, a problem that is getting worse and being exacerbated by the inability of key federal agencies to work together.
It’s a problem that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., says demands congressional attention to protect the interests of American citizens and those in the U.S. legally.
According to the report from Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration J. Robert George, only half of those 1.4 million Americans were even notified that their Social Security information was compromised.
He also concluded that tracking the fraud is more difficult than it needs to be because the IRS is forbidden from working with the Department of Homeland Security to find those responsible.
Rohrabacher finds that unacceptable but not surprising. He says the problem is getting worse because more and more people are coming to the U.S. illegally with the expectation of receiving federal benefits.
“You have got a large number now, millions of people who are coming to this country who thought they were going to get government benefits,just like Americans” said Rohrabacher.
He says failing to address this issue
“Today, we’ve evolved into a situation where if people are here illegally can end up compromising the Social Security system or any of our systems designed to help Americans and legal immigrants, it’ll just destroy the whole system. It’s in the process. We are in the process of collapsing now,” said Rohrabacher.
Rohrabacher says the problem also persists because of leaders who encourage the problem.
“This is the same mentality as people who are in elected office who are telling us they are going to provide sanctuary in cities and states around the United States for people who are here illegally, even when they’re criminals. I mean how absurd is that,” said Rohrabacher.
He says the bureaucratic wall that prevents IRS-DHS collaboration is from the same mindset.
“This same gang has managed to sneak this type of restriction into law or into practice here at the federal level. We need to make sure it’s dealt with as quickly as we can. Now that we have a president and two houses of Congress, we need to prove we can act,” said Rohrabacher.
The congressman says there are definitely good, honorable people working inside the federal government, but he warns the number of political operatives who are embedding themselves into the bureaucracy is a problem.
“There are a lot of other people who have been making their way through the bureaucracy that have been helped along by liberal-left political connections, sort of wormed their way into the system. I know a lot of people in the last eight years have made sure they’re in positions throughout our government,” said Rohrabacher.
While Rohrabacher isn’t immediately sure of what exact legislation is needed to allow greater interagency cooperation and to crack down on Social Security fraud, he says the process is clear.
“We’d have to name those legal impediments to say specifically that the cooperation that’s necessary to track down this type of fraud committed against the American people by illegal immigrants and that all areas of government should be legally able to work together,” said Rohrabacher.
On Thursday, the House of Representatives passed multiple bill addressing illegal immigration, one to ratchet up the punishment for repeat illegal immigrants and the other to threaten the withholding of federal dollars to cities and other jurisdictions that impede the work of federal immigration officials.
Rohrabacher says addressing Social Security fraud and bureaucratic hurdles is another test the public expects Republicans to pass.
“Caliphate” Crumbling, Government Healthcare Horror, Trump Twitter Wars
David French of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud new developments in the Middle East as ISIS loses its grip on Mosul and its defeat appears increasingly likely. They condemn the appalling Charlie Gard decision in which a London court decided that a terminally ill child will be removed from life support — against the wishes of his parents — and reflect on the implications of single-payer healthcare. They criticize President Trump’s latest Twitter barrage against Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, claiming Trump’s language debases the culture. Plus, a follow-up revelation in the McEnroe-Williams tennis controversy.
POTUS Sinks WOTUS
President Trump made good on a major campaign promise Tuesday, as the Environmental Protection Agency announced the beginning of a process that will roll back the Waters of the United States rule, a move that has champions of private property rights cheering loudly.
On Tuesday, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt made the policy shift official.
“We are taking significant action to return power to the states and provide regulatory certainty to our nation’s farmers and businesses,” said Pruitt in a statement.
“This is the first step in the two-step process to redefine ‘waters of the U.S.’ and we are committed to moving through this re-evaluation to quickly provide regulatory certainty, in a way that is thoughtful, transparent and collaborative with other agencies and the public,” he added
“It’s a big day for freedom for property rights and the Constitution,” said R.J. Smith, a senior fellow in environmental policy at the National Center for Public Policy Research.
Smith says he Waters of the United States rule, or WOTUS, which was put forward during the Obama administration, was nothing more than gross distortion of what Congress intended for the EPA to regulate as part of the Clean Water Act.
The act specifically allowed government to regulate “navigable” waterways, which Smith said was well-understood to mean bodies of water on which commerce traveled through shipping. But he says the government was content to leash its authority.
“‘Navigable waters’ kept getting stretched by the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers year after year. First it would go to tributary streams. Then it would go to smaller streams. Then it would go to creeks and it would go to irrigation ditches, things that nothing could navigate,” said Smith.
It didn’t stop there.
“Then it began to control the lands that were adjacent to navigable waters and lands that were adjacent to things that ran into navigable waters,” said Smith.
“By vastly expanding this,they’ve reached a point now where something that was only supposed to protect major rivers to see that commerce could take place in America now controls whether a farmer can plow his own land,” said Smith.
And that creeping government control forces property owners to beg Uncle Sam to use their own property.
“It takes an endless amount of time, years of time, money and still uncertainty to try to get a permit to use your own land. Anything that rain falls on now could technically be considered waters of the United States,” said Smith, noting that building a home on seemingly dry land on your own property could lead to millions of dollars in government fines.
The rescinding of WOTUS is not the end of the story. Pruitt’s announcement triggers a 30-day comment period, which will be considered in revising the existing rule.
“EPA and the corps together will come up with a revised rule, hopefully a rule that protects property rights and puts the EPA and the corps back into the constitutional mode they’re supposed to be in,” said Smith.
He also wants Congress to make sure the EPA can never stretch the definition of “navigable waters” ever again.
“The United States Congress needs to go back and revisit the Clean Water Act of 1972 and amend it so that it unequivocally says that “navigable” means navigable and it means by commercial shipping, not by somebody in a motor boat, not by somebody in a canoe or a kayak or a rubber raft or even floating down a little tiny creek in a tube,” said Smith.