Radio America Online News Bureau

Maryland School Shooting, Driverless Disaster, Nixon Challenges Status Cuomo

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are horrified to see another high school shooting, this time in Maryland, but they are gratified to see the school resource officer intervened quickly to neutralize the shooter.  They also react to the news of a driverless vehicle killing a pedestrian in Arizona and explain why humans behind the wheel will always make more sense than a computer.  And they pop the popcorn as “Sex and the City” actress Cynthia Nixon mounts a liberal primary challenge to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Share

Cabinet Secretary Ethics Woes: Corruption, Confusion or Both?

by

Several members of the Trump cabinet are under scrutiny for alleged ethics violations after reports of using taxpayer dollars for personal travel or spending huge sums of money on office furniture, and a government waste watchdog says much clearer ethics rules would make a huge difference.

Several Trump administration cabinet officials have raised eyebrows.  Former Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price resigned last year after reports of using taxpayer dollars to take private flights to various events.  Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin are under fire for questionable travel expenses.  Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and Housing Secretary Ben Carson are facing questions about lavish spending on office decor.

So do stories like these suggest the cabinet secretaries have a stunning disregard for taxpayer dollars or is it the result of a labyrinth of confusing ethics rules that leave these officials wondering what can be charged to the government and what can’t?

Citizens Against Government Waste President Tom Schatz says these stories make for good political fodder but there’s more than meets the eye.

“Taxpayer-funded travel has always been an easy target for both sides to try to score political points.  The problem is no one knows what prior administrations did , how they spent the money, (and) what the budget amount might be for the various activities,” said Schatz.

“It’s easy to point out a few trips here or there that might look like something’s wrong.  But again, no one knows what the prior secretaries did.  There’s no way to know whether any of this may be within the rules, which also differ – not just between different administrations but even among agencies,” said Schatz.

And how is it that one administration has no idea what rules the previous one enacted?

“All of this information is really inaccessible.  There’s no searchable database to find out how often federal officials use taxpayer-funded travel, how much it costs, whether it’s necessary, whether it’s done on military aircraft or private planes.  It’s confusing.  It’s disorganized,” said Schatz.

And while Congress is not at the centerpiece of the recent stories, Schatz says that’s where responsibility ultimate lies for establishing a clear set of rules.

“Congress is ultimately at fault for how much money is being spent because they approve the budget.  This recent budget deal increases spending 14 percent.  We continue to suggest that Congress find ways to cut spending, to offset these increases if it’s that critical to increase defense spending and non-defense spending,” said Schatz.

Members of Congress seems to have a better handle on what their ethics rules are but Schatz says there’s still way too much wiggle room.

“There is nothing that shows the list of congressional travel.  There is no committee vote.  There is no transparency about what the legislators are supposed to accomplish.

“One thing that did occur over the years is they stopped taking spouses and staff to the Paris Air Show, but why are they going at all as members?  What happens with the results of these trips?  What’s the legislative activity that follows?” asked Schatz.

Schatz is doing more than complaining about the lack of transparency.  He and National Taxpayers Union President Pete Sepp launched an effort to bring clarity to the process following the Price resignation last year.

“We asked taxpayers to sign an online petition to demand detailed transparency on who was traveling, the mode of transportation, who is traveling with the public official, the purpose of the trip, the compilation of an annual report – including the cost associated with military aircraft and personnel – and then put it on one website that covers all federal agencies so that everyone can see what is going on.

“Then it might be more sensible to say, this individual or that individual or this agency or that agency is or is not doing something that violates the rules.  And I think uniform rules would also be very helpful,” said Schatz.

But will Congress actually address any of this?

“It would be nice if this happened, but like everything else in Washington, it’s just inertia, whether it’s the bureaucracy or whether it’s Congress itself after the issues with Sec. Price.

“They talked about having Chief of Staff John Kelly sign off on cabinet-level travel, but that still doesn’t address the inconsistent and fragmented reporting of travel rules and the exact costs that are associated with the travel.  That still probably wouldn’t be available,” said Schatz.

Standard Podcast [ 7:21 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

McCabe Mania, Media Notice Austin Bombings, D.C. Lawmaker’s Conspiracy Theory

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America have whiplash from all the media hyperbole in the wake of Andrew McCabe getting fired, almost all of it from people who have never read the inspector general’s report.  They also hammer President Trump for gloating about McCabe’s ouster and McCabe for suggesting his firing was a political hit job from Trump when multiple DOJ officials recommended it.  They also applaud the media for finally noticing a series of bombings in Austin, Texas, which have killed or injured several people in a story reminiscent of the Unabomber.  And they have some fun with D.C. city council member Trayon White alleging that the Rothschilds control the weather to bring calamity to American cities and then swoop in to pay for the cleanup and take control of the cities.

Share

Navy Considering Atheist Chaplains

by

The U.S. Navy is considering allowing atheists into the Chaplain Corps, a move that even the Obama administration opposed and that Christian conservatives say would squander precious resources and open the corps to almost anything in the years ahead.

“I do think it would be really deleterious,” said Family Research Council Senior Fellow Chris Gacek.

This is not the first round of this fight.  In 2015, Jason Heap filed suit to become a Navy chaplain after the Defense Department rejected his request because he sought to affiliate with a pair of humanist groups instead of a religious denomination.  The Obama administration fought Heap’s lawsuit and won but Heap is making the push again.

This time, the U.S. Navy seems more open to the idea.

“The Defense Department won all the cases against Jason Heap so you would think that they would leave well enough alone and, therefore, there wouldn’t be a problem in the future.  But there is a board called the Chaplain Appointment and Retention Eligibility Advisory Group that is recommending that the Navy accept him as a chaplain.

“So even though he couldn’t get it through the courts or through other processes, there’s another group of faceless bureaucrats that have an agenda and are trying to push it through,” said Gacek.

Gacek argues that if the Navy allows an atheist chaplain there’s no telling where that decision could lead.

“What’s the limit?  There’s no reason to think it would just be stuck at one or that you wouldn’t have more of them or all sorts of people coming in here who are just basically yoga instructors,” said Gacek.

“It’s like saying the pastors and priests division has to accept atheists.  A does not equal B here.  It’s like having square wheels or something.  It’s kind of hard to imagine you even have to have this debate.

“It’s important I think to maintain the integrity of the institution.  We’ve had chaplains since 1775, when George Washington himself had Congress establish the chaplains,” said Gacek.

While the Navy considers and possibly advances this idea, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., 22 other senators and 40 House members are pushing back.  Gacek says that pressure and possible appropriations riders on funding could force the Navy’s hand on this.

Gacek says he’s surprised this idea has any oxygen at all in a Republican administration.

“If you had a sensible Secretary of Defense and they were in charge of these things, this would be taken care of.  It’s sort of amazing that this is happening in the Trump administration,” said Gacek.

In addition to pointing out the logical inconsistency of an atheist chaplain, Gacek says scarce resources for the Chaplain Corps would stretched even thinner for those identifying with a specific faith or denomination.  He says those chaplains are vital in ministering to people far from home.

The Chaplain Corps is already strained.  Gacek says eight years of Obama’s cultural agenda took a heavy toll.

“In the Obama administration, you had certain social agendas being pushed.  There were people who wouldn’t accede to the idea of same-sex marriage.  I can imagine it’s only getting worse with all these new gender categories they’re trying to cram down everybody’s throat.

“Since the Bible has a set idea about sex, there being only two of them, and there being only two genders, this isn’t really going to fly for a lot of people,” said Gacek.

Share

Truth About Haspel, Dems’ Anti-Pelosi Canard, Flake’s Tired Act

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America shake their heads as ProPublica issues a massive correction to confirm that President Trump’s nominee to be CIA director didn’t oversee the waterboarding of terrorists after all and that the original reporting was based on assumptions.  They also sound the alarm on all the supposedly moderate Democrats running away from Nancy Pelosi as they run for seats in competitive or right-leaning districts.  News flash:  If Democrats win the House, Pelosi will be speaker.  And they roll their eyes as Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake says the refusal of Republicans to denounce Trump suggests maybe the GOP doesn’t deserve to lead.

Share

‘Not Just About Abortion, but Discrimination’

by

The abortion debate has intensified in recent days as pro-choice activists push back against a series of new state laws banning abortion due to a pre-natal diagnosis of Down Syndrome, but a leading pro-life voice says such abortions are nothing more than “genetic discrimination” and a disturbing sign for our culture.

In recent months, North Dakota, Indiana, Ohio, and Louisiana have adopted laws banning abortions because the unborn child is found to have Down Syndrome.  The legal pushback is already underway, and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus stirred up a fierce response by defending the decision of most mothers to abort such children.

“I’m going to be blunt here: That was not the child I wanted. That was not the choice I would have made. You can call me selfish, or worse, but I am in good company. The evidence is clear that most women confronted with the same unhappy alternative would make the same decision,” wrote Marcus, who never had an abortion in such circumstances but said she would have.

Dr. David Prentice is vice president at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, which is affiliated with the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List.  Prentice confirms that the vast majority of babies with Down Syndrome are aborted, and he says this takes the abortion debate down an even uglier path.

“This is not just about abortion.  This is about discrimination.  This is a genetic discrimination where you are saying just because these little kids have a particular set of chromosomes – in particular they have one additional chromosome – that that makes them essentially unworthy of life,” said Prentice.

“We’re starting to parse out here, pre-natally, who has a life worth living or not.  It hearkens back to some of the horrific genocides of the past, that simply because someone was different, we’re just going to kill them.

“Well, now that hunt is going genetic and it’s going into the womb,” said Prentice.

Prentice says this could lead to abortions based on other characteristics discovered in the womb, including short stature or nearsightedness.  He says a chilling parallel is sex-selection abortion in places like China, where the one-child policy ended up in the abortions of at least 160 million girls.

He says the idea of ending a life in the womb because it may not be the child you envisioned is horrifying to him.

“As a society, we shouldn’t accept any kind of discrimination and certainly not pre-natal, where we’re going to kill somebody before they even have a chance to be born,” said Prentice.

He says our culture is in big trouble if we start to reject children because they are not exactly what we ordered.

“This becomes commodity shopping.  I want this kind of baby, I want this kind of baby and I’m just going to return them, so to speak, if they don’t match up.  Again, it is horrific in this thought that we are rejecting somebody just because they don’t measure up to our own particular desires,” said Prentice.

Prentice says many women are convinced to abort their babies based on statistics suggesting their children will have severe health challenges, a low IQ, and live much shorter lives.  He says those statistics are long outdated and the average life expectancy for a child with Down Syndrome is about 60 years old.

He also says the families that choose to welcome these children are overjoyed with their lives.

“It’s something like a 95-98 percent rate of happiness and satisfaction with their lives.  Their brothers and sisters love them.  Their parents love them.  I think in one case you might say that this extra chromosome actually imbues them with additional love,” said Prentice.

Prentice is not about to speculate how the Supreme Court may eventually rule on the challenges to the state laws.  But he has a simple message for any judges who hear this case.

“Do they deserve a chance at life or should we be discriminating a lethal discrimination against them?  My hope is that they will rule on the side of life,” said Prentice.

If they don’t, Prentice says our culture will be much darker.

“That reflects on our relationship with all members of our species, not just unborn children.  If we really consider other people simply ends to our own desires, we’re in a really sorry state,” said Prentice.

Standard Podcast [ 9:50 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

U.S. Hammers Russia, Carson’s Big Spending, Bowling Ball Test

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud the Trump administration for slapping sanctions on Russia and salute UN Ambassador Nikki Haley for calling out Russia’s chemical weapons attack against a Kremlin critic in Great Britain.  They also chew out Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson for not keeping a better watch over the effort to spend more than $31,000 on a dining set and for possibly misleading the public about it.  And they roll their eyes as President Trump tells GOP donors that Japan engages in unfair trading practices by dropping bowling balls on the hoods of U.S. imports and deeming them unfit for sale in Japan.

Share

Preparing Police for Mass Shootings

by

As the media focus on the thousands of students walking out of school Wednesday to protest gun violence and demand gun control legislation, a longtime officer and police academy director says a critical element of stopping or limiting mass shootings is finding the right people to become police officers and training them well.

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School did have armed security when a former student killed 17 people on Feb. 14, but resource officer Scot Peterson did not enter the school when he determined shots were being fired inside.

Many critics branded Peterson a coward for his inaction, but 21-year Illinois police officer Randy Petersen (no relation) says it’s more complicated than that.

“Maybe it’s not a cowardly person but someone who is unsure of themselves, unskilled, haven’t been trained up properly.  Anytime you have something like that, we can have this situation where we shoot people that we don’t want shot or we don’t shoot people that need to be shot,” said Petersen, who also directed one of the largest police academies in Texas and is a senior researcher at Right on Crime.

“To go to the point where we have a police officer that is either incompetent in their physical skills, their defensive tactics skills, their shooting, they’re not going to have confidence and a lack of confidence can get you to a point where an officer either fails to act or overreacts,” said Petersen.

Petersen says a special type of demeanor is needed to be an effective police officer.

“We want a blend of these two qualities where a person is not overly excitable, not easily offended, but at the same time very competent and very capable,” said Petersen.

He says finding those qualities ought to be a high priority in the hiring process.

“We can train people to fight.  We can train them to be good at sports.  We can train them for an event, but we don’t know how they’re going to perform before they actually do it.  What we can do is, during hiring and testing, we can have an idea of what we’re looking for an officer to be able to do,” said Petersen.

However, Petersen admits the vast majority of police officers never fire their weapons during their careers, so how can there be any certainty how they’ll perform under pressure?

He says training drills can be very effective.

“You’d be surprised at how realistic your role players, if you have good ones.  Some of the technologies we have can really re-create the situations you can get in the training academy or in inservice training.  You can get a real picture for how someone’s going to respond,” said Petersen.

“You can put them under pressure where the stress levels will give them that adrenaline dump, make them scared, make them nervous, make them physically exhausted, right up to the point to where the real situation is going to be just a little bit different,” said Petersen.

He says the key question is what police departments are wiling to do about the officers who can’t do the job well.

“The problem becomes whether or not we’re willing to weed out people who can’t.  In a lot of situations I think that we don’t.  We don’t weed out the people that we recognize and say, ‘I think this person’s not going to be able to do this,'” said Petersen.

Petersen says the problem is often not with the police departments but with the powerful allies of the officers not measuring up to the job.

“The union can make it difficult in a lot of states to terminate an officer that either has a lot of complaints filed against them or is basically incompetent.  A lot of times they can end up getting their jobs back.

“It’s not that police agencies themselves are hesitant to get rid of them.  Sometimes they fire them and they come right back on the job,” said Petersen.

While Right on Crime does not endorse any particular legislation to address mass shootings, Petersen says armed school security officers can be a good thing, but only if proven to be capable of handling a crisis of that magnitude.

He also says those officers can be limited in their effectiveness on a large piece of property.

“A police officer that’s on a sprawling campus still may have to run all the way across the campus to get to it, which may only take a matter of a minute or two but that’s a minute or two that we have active shooting going on.  By the time the officer gets there, they may be winded.  That changes the dynamics of being able to shoot and fight skillfully,” said Petersen.

On the issue allowing teachers to carry guns if they want to, Petersen says it may make a big difference when seconds count.

“Having administrators and/or teachers that are armed would be keeping in line with the doctrine of active shooter training because you’re going to have people with guns on scene faster to intercept that person,” said Peterson.

Standard Podcast [ 11:42 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Dems Slam Hillary, CIA Pick May Not Be Confirmed, Cartoons and Gun Control

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are glad to see red state Democrats push back against Hillary Clinton’s suggestion that she lost those states because of racism and misogyny but also get a kick out watching the Democrats squirm.  They also discuss the rough confirmation road ahead for Trump CIA nominee Gina Haspel as a result of her involvement in the enhanced interrogation program during the George W. Bush administration.  And they slam Viacom for going dark on all if its cable channels for 17 minutes Wednesday morning in solidarity with the national school walkout event promoting gun control, including kids’ channels like Nickelodeon and Nick Jr.  Of course, they then feel compelled to offer their assessments of Nick Jr staples “Bubble Guppies” and “Paw Patrol.”

Share

Tillerson ‘Pretty Well Failed’

by

President Trump fired Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Tuesday, in a decision that ends months of speculation about Tillerson’s future, and former Pentagon official Jed Babbin believes it also ends a disappointing tenure for the nation’s top diplomat.

Babbin also urges President Trump to make concrete demands before going forward with face-to-face meetings with North Korea.

News of Tillerson’s firing came from Trump’s Twitter account Tuesday morning.

“Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA, will become our new Secretary of State. He will do a fantastic job! Thank you to Rex Tillerson for his service! Gina Haspel will become the new Director of the CIA, and the first woman so chosen. Congratulations to all!” tweeted Trump.

News reports later indicated Tillerson learned of his firing from the tweet, but reports had circulated for months that Trump and Tillerson might go their separate ways and that Pompeo was the leading candidate to replace him.

Babbin says it was time for a change.

“I hate to say it, but I think he pretty well failed,” said Babbin, who served as deputy undersecretary of defense in the George H.W. Bush administration and is now a contributing editor at the American Spectator.

Babbin says Tillerson was ineffective because he mishandled some of the biggest national security issues facing the U.S.

“In December, he basically begged the North Koreans to come to the negotiation table.  He said, ‘We’ll talk about the weather.  We’ll talk about the shape of the table.  We’ll talk about anything you want without preconditions.’  That was precisely the wrong thing to do,” said Babbin.

“He has been opposing the president on getting rid of the Iran deal that Obama made.  I think that’s the prescient reason why Mr. Trump fired him,” said Babbin.

And Babbin believes Iran policy might be a key reason Pompeo is Trump’s choice to replace Tillerson

“I think he’s going to be much more on President Trump’s wavelength.  He certainly has the president’s confidence, which Tillerson did not, and I think that speaks well for his relationship with the outside world.  After all, he’s going to be our top diplomat and someone in that position has to be on the president’s wavelength and Tillerson certainly wasn’t,” said Babbin.

Pompeo is likely to win Senate confirmation without much trouble.  The same cannot be said for Gina Haspel, the deputy CIA director whom Trump is tapping to replace Pompeo.

“She going to have a very rough time getting confirmed and she may not be confirmed.  The Democrats are going to go completely ape about the fact that she supervised the enhanced interrogation program.  She was heavily involved in the extraordinary renditions business.  She’s not going to get a warm reception on Capitol Hill by any means,” said Babbin.

Babbin says the early reviews on Haspel are mixed.

“She’s been head of the clandestine service.  She’s gotten a lot of top awards at the CIA.  She’s a CIA career professional.  It seems like she could work out.  On the other hand, I’m hearing from a lot of my sources in that community that she pretty much is a Brennan clone and that’s not a good thing,” said Babbin, referring to controversial Obama-era CIA Director John Brennan.

“I think that Mr. Trump would not have selected her if he was not confident that she would support him on things like getting out of the Iran deal,” said Babbin.

The White House has explained that the Tillerson-Pompeo switch is happening now so that the new diplomatic team can be running at full steam heading into the talks with North Korea in May.

Babbin says regardless of who is on the negotiating team, President Trump needs to insist upon some preconditions before ever meeting with Kim Jong-Un.

“There has to be preconditions to any such negotiation.  There almost always are.  Any major summit is set up with the other side meeting some preconditions that we establish.  The fact that the president jumped into this without setting preconditions is something that’s a really big mistake,” said Babbin.

However, Babbin believes Trump can correct that mistake with very specific demands.

“The only real precondition, the only thing that means anything, would be for them to verifiably mothball their nuclear testing and their missile testing.  That means we would have to have inspectors in North Korea, which frankly I think they’ll never allow,” said Babbin.

While hopes rise for some sort of easing of nuclear sanctions as a result of the upcoming talks, Babbin is pouring the cold water of reality over the event.  He says every North Korean leader has reneged on their promises.

“They have broken every single agreement that they have ever entered into.  They renounced the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.  Heck, they’ve even renounced the armistice agreement that ended the Korean War in 1953.  So you can’t trust these guts in any way unless you have immediate, intrusive, and at-will inspections of everything in North Korea there’s not going to be a basis for any agreement,” said Babbin.

And that’s just fine with him.  He says no deal is probably the best outcome from the summit.

“I think there’s no room for agreement here.  There is room for our sanctions to continue to work and President Trump needs to have considerable praise and credit for that.  That’s the only reason they’re coming to the negotiation table right now and we need to keep [the sanctions] up indefinitely,” said Babbin.

Standard Podcast [ 7:03 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share