Radio America Online News Bureau

Tillerson Gets Tossed, Hillary’s Ugly Excuses, Schools Embrace Walkouts

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are not all surprised by President Trump firing Secretary of State Rex Tillerson given their distant relationship and they hope Mike Pompeo can be effective as America’s top diplomat.  They also unload on Hillary Clinton after her ugly overseas explanations that Trump won the red states by appealing to people who don’t want blacks to have rights or women to have jobs and that white married women backed Trump because they did what their husbands or bosses told them to do.  And they slam liberal school administrators for actively supporting Wednesday’s National School Walkout to push for gun control.

Share

Schwarzenegger’s ‘Shakedown’

by

Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently announced he would be working to bring forth lawsuits against the big oil companies “for knowingly killing people all over the world,” but a leading policy expert says this sort of legal action is nothing short of a “shakedown.”

Schwarzenegger revealed his intentions at the annual SXSW festival in Texas during an interview with Politico’s “Off Message” podcast.

“This is no different from the smoking issue. The tobacco industry knew for years and years and years and decades, that smoking would kill people, would harm people and create cancer, and were hiding that fact from the people and denied it. Then eventually they were taken to court and had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars because of that.

“The oil companies knew from 1959 on, they did their own study that there would be global warming happening because of fossil fuels, and on top of it that it would be risky for people’s lives, that it would kill,” said Schwarzenegger.

He says legal action is coming.

“We are now talking to law firms to go and do exactly the same thing as they’ve done in the tobacco industry, where we sue the oil companies for knowingly killing people all over the world.  There’s 7-9 million people dying every year because of pollution because of fossil fuels,” said Schwarzenegger.

Competitive Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow Christopher C. Horner believes there’s not much sound logic behind this legal effort.

“I think he’s beginning with the seed of something he’s heard somewhere and then just flying off into nutty land,” said Horner.  “I know it’s very fashionable, including in the courts in California, to say things where he begins, but it doesn’t make it any more sane.”

Horner also takes aim at the 7-9 million people who supposedly die from man-caused global warming each year.  He has no idea where Schwarzenegger gets that number.

“That’s a lot, so I guess he could name 7-9 of them, right?  But no, he can’t.  They just sort of pull these things out of the ether.  There are computer models to do everything this agenda requires, including computer model statistical deaths.  They don’t have names or toe tags,” said Horner, who says he does have the names of people who died because of energy poverty, which he asserts is the end result of the climate change agenda.

“We do have names and toe tags and I’ve got a whole Power Point presentation drawn from the English-speaking press about seniors who have died of hypothermia as these policies take root in the UK.

“There are people who are dying from energy poverty, which comes when, as one man put it, this causes your electricity rates to ‘necessarily skyrocket,'” said Horner, quoting then-presidential candidate Barack Obama from 2008.

Horner says this sort of threatened legal action is really just a money grab.

“In essence, this is a shakedown.  In 2012, there was a meeting out in -surprise – California, in La Jolla, in which they produced a report.  The report said if they could just get one sympathetic attorney general or district attorney to start subpoenaing these people’s documents to use against them, then we could wring this big settlement out of them,” said Horner.

This is not conjecture, says Horner.  He says the left openly admitted this strategy until they got called on it.

“The lawyer who started all this for all of these plaintiffs, named Matt Pawa, admitted to Nation magazine that they were tired of waiting for legislation, and so they were going to try to use the courts.  He later denied to the Washington Times that he ever said that,” said Horner.

“We caught him, using Freedom of Information Act requests, working with state attorneys general to push this agenda because it was a failed agenda through the proper political process,” said Horner.

But while the total number of people dying from hazardous environmental conditions may not be quantifiable, many climate change activists point to poor air quality in places like Los Angeles, Beijing, and beyond.

Horner says that’s a non sequitur.

“They’ll yell about catastrophic, man-made global warming and immediately shift to cancer and smog.  That’s what you call changing the subject,” he said.

“I would change the subject too.  It’s not called catastrophic man-made global smogging.  You’re talking about a pollutant and a pollution issue for which we have regulatory regimes.  You want to reduce smog, go through the smog laws and regulations we have,” said Horner.

“But that wouldn’t really pay off, would it?  That wouldn’t pay off the trial lawyers.  That wouldn’t pay off your political constituencies through these tobacco-style settlements,” he added.

Horner says the climate change agenda is still dangerous even though activists are not convincing the public or lawmakers to enact their policies.

“No one has ever spent this kind of money and not prevailed, except for the Soviets, as the global warming industry.  And it does end up at a number called the bottom of every list.  The environment is at the bottom and this is at the bottom of environmental concerns.

“And let me tell you, thank you people like Gov. Schwarzenegger.  One of the reasons catastrophic man-made global warming hysteria ranks last is because of this sort of moonbattery.  Keep it up.  If wee didn’t have you, we’d have to invent you,” said Horner.

Standard Podcast [ 11:36 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Kelly’s Ethics Crackdown, Problems in Pennsylvania, Warren’s DNA Dodge

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud White House Chief of Staff John Kelly for blasting four cabinet secretaries on ethics matters ranging from travel to office decor.  They also shake their heads a day in advance of the special congressional election in Pennsylvania, as the Republican appears to be running a very weak campaign and the Democrat believes life begins at conception but opposes late-term abortions.  And they get a kick out of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren refusing to take a DNA test to resolve the controversy over her claims of Cherokee ancestry.

Share

Climate Change: Fact vs. Fiction

by

Every destructive weather event is not caused by climate change, there is no scientific consensus that human activity is endangering the planet, and there’s no proof the carbon dioxide is actually bad for us.

Those are among the iconoclastic conclusions reached by ClimateDepot.com founder Marc Morano in his new book, “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change.”

The first target for Morano is the environmental movement changing the terminology from global warming to climate change.  Because of that, climate change activists can now chalk up every severe weather event to humans damaging the planet.

“What they try to do is switch it over to extreme weather.  In other words, every drought, flood, hurricane, tornado, and yes blizzard, is now the result of global warming and what they expected.  That was one of the shifts in the name of climate change because then they could cover anything and everything,” said Morano.

But the blame doesn’t stop at weather developments.  He says the climate change movement sees the impact everywhere.

“An increase in prostitution?  That’s global warming.  Vehicle thefts going up? That’s global warming.  Bar room brawls?  That’s global warming.  Bad coffee crop?  That’s global warming.  That’s climate change.  Everything’s shifted over to the name climate change and they blame everything on it,” said Morano.

By 2018, many of the dire climate predictions of flooded coasts and other calamities were predicted to come true.  So how do those scientists explain those erroneous projections?

“They have opposite predictions.  If you bet for both teams to win the Super Bowl, you’re going to be a winner no matter what.  They’ve done that.  They can go back on snow in particular.  Global warming will cause less snow.  That’s what the United Nations said, that’s what the United Nations scientists said.  That’s what was in all these studies.

“But they had a few studies that said global warming will cause an increase in snow.  So they predicted global warming will cause more snow and less snow.  now they can come out and say they predicted it.  They predicted global warming will cause fewer lightning strikes and more lightning strikes.  Now, not matter what happens, they predicted it – more malaria and less malaria, more hurricanes and fewer hurricanes,” said Morano.

But how can a “consensus” of 97 percent of climate scientists be wrong?

Easy, says Morano.  That number is made up and there is nowhere near that kind of consensus.

“One study claiming 97 percent of scientists wasn’t even 97 scientists.  It wasn’t even 87 scientists.  It was 77 scientists and we don’t even know who these 77 anonymous scientists are.  We don’t know their university affiliation.  We don’t know their expertise.

“They got a survey that started with tens of thousands and they whittled it down.  They tortured the data until they got what they wanted,” said Morano.

And Morano stresses the reason for all this sleight of hand is not to be missed.

“In the words of the United Nations climate chief, whom I interviewed for the book, she actually says, ‘We want a centralized transformation that will make life on planet earth very different in order to fight global warming,” said Morano.

He says this is nothing new.

“I go back to the 1970’s and I show that different environmental scares had the same solutions: wealth redistribution, central planning, and global governance.  These are the exact phrases they’ve been using for 40 years trying to promote the solution to the crisis.  Global warming is just the most recent crisis,” said Morano.

Morano interviewed former Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus, an ardent opponent of the climate change movement because it reminds him of what he saw for decades behind the Iron Curtain.

“He said, ‘Since the fall of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, the greatest threat since the fall is ambitious environmentalism from the climate agenda.’  He considers them the greatest threat to liberty, this whole climate agenda.  And this is a man who grew up under that agenda,” said Morano.

Morano is fully confident the truth is on his side in this debate, but he is unsure whether his side will win the debate given the United Nations, most world leaders, Hollywood, the media, and liberal politicians all insisting the science is settled and action must be taken.

He is especially concerned about how early schools are targeting young kids with this message.

“This is absolute brainwashing of children.  They are taught from a very young age that there is no dissent on this issue.  Not only is there no dissent but no dissent is allowed.  You are going to be called an idiot.  You are going to be disenfranchised.  You will have no career unless you toe the line.  This is very far from science.

“One scientist I interviewed was actually called a heretic after she reversed her view and became a skeptic.  Those are not the words of science.  Those are the words of religion,” said Morano.

Morano says he wrote the book to give kids and parents a way to push back.

“The book is an entertaining, humorous book first and foremost.  Make no mistake about it, this is not a boring textbook.  This is for parents and for anyone in the public who wants to debate and parents who want ammunition as their kids get indoctrinated,” said Morano.

He applauds President Trump for setting the U.S. on the path to withdrawing from the Paris climate deal and for rolling back a number of government regulations from water rules to emissions standards on coal-fired power plants.  Still, Morano urges Trump to find a science czar to push back on the science as well as the damage such rules could do to the economy.

Morano also says the environmental movement will never stop.

“They are all in on this.  They are going to keep pushing and they have an agenda.  And if global warming were to fade, they would replace it with another environmental scare at some point, with the same solutions,” said Morano.

Share

Is Trump-Kim Meeting Smart? Peterson’s Story Doesn’t Hold Up, Big Jobs Report

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America look at the possible pros and cons of President Trump meeting face-to-face with Kim Jong-Un, hoping there’s a shot at progress but realizing the North Koreans have no track record of honesty.  They also fume as radio chatter from the Florida high school shooting confirms Deputy Scot Peterson knew right away that shots were being fired inside the building, a direct contradiction of his earlier explanation that he did not enter the building because he thought the shots were coming from outside.  And they celebrate a robust jobs report, with over 300,000 new jobs added in February.

Share

North Korea Able to Reach Entire U.S. Within Months

by

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says North Korea has no intention of scrapping its nuclear program, is trying to sucker the United States into relaxing sanctions, and is now just months away from being able to deploy nuclear weapons capable of reaching any point in the United States.

Earlier this week, South Korea trumpeted the news that North Korea is allegedly willing to suspend nuclear testing in exchange for direct talks with the United States and may even be open to ending its nuclear program altogether.

Bolton doesn’t believe a word of it.

“The North Koreans have been conducting an absolutely masterful propaganda campaign, beginning with their participation in the Winter Olympics,” said Bolton.

But he says the true objective is clear.

“The only thing they’re trying to do is get us to abandon the pressure that we’re putting on them and hopefully foreswear the possible use of military force, which nobody wants but nobody wants North Korea with nuclear weapons either.  That’s what this is about,” said Bolton.

Bolton says the North Koreans are on the verge of posing a very real danger to every part of the United States.

“They are very close to achieving their long-sought objective of deliverable nuclear weapons.  CIA Director Mike Pompeo said recently that the North was within a “handful” of months – his phrase, a handful of months – of being able to land a thermonuclear weapon on any target in the United States they want,” said Bolton.

However, Bolton says this is not merely a distraction to buy time.  He believes the big stick approach from the Trump administration is working.

“I think the North, finally figuring out that Barack Obama is no longer president, is worried about what Donald Trump might do.  So their response is to throw up a lot of smoke and dust in the air and hope to divert our attention, first with the Olympics and now with this supposed offer to sit down,” said Bolton.

Bolton is adamant that North Korea has zero interest in actually making nice with the U.S. or South Korea and says the proof can be seen in our recent history.

“They’ve made commitments four separate times in international agreements to give up their nuclear weapons program.

“Four times they’ve lied about it.  Does history ever mean anything?  If you’ve negotiated with somebody for 25 years and failed to get agreement, what possible reason is there to think they’d agree in year 26,” said Bolton.

So what will deter North Korea?  Bolton says we’re facing a series of difficult options.  He outright rejects former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s recommendation for the world simply to accept North Korea as a nuclear power, but hopes the solutions can come through engagement with China.

“There’s really only one diplomatic play left here and that’s trying to convince China either to do what they uniquely have the capability of doing, overthrowing the regime in North Korea and putting in something that’s at least vaguely more reasonable, or working with us for the reunification of the Korean peninsula,” said Bolton.

And while he hopes to avoid it, Bolton says the military option must be considered.

“The other things we have to look at is the potential to use military force against the regime’s program to make sure that they don’t endanger us and our allies in South Korea and Japan.  Neither of these options is very attractive, but that’s where we are after 25 years of failure,” said Bolton.

But one of those allies is also contributing to the problem.  South Korean President Moon Jae-in is a strong advocate of reunification with North Korea and Bolton says Moon is actually strengthening the regime that wants to conquer him.

“There’s a compassionate, humanitarian argument here.  Many South Koreans have family in the North.  But the fact is the North is a 25 million-person prison camp.  It’s not going to treat its people humanely.  It’s going to take the subsidies and use them for its own purposes,” said Bolton.

He says South Korea’s generosity was fully exploited by North Korea at the Winter Olympics.

“South Korea actually paid for the North to participate, one more series of subsidies to keep the Kim Jong-Un regime in power, unfortunately by our allies in Seoul,” said Bolton.

Share

Senate Dems on the Ropes, Sanctuary State Showdown, Let’s Try Socialism?

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America welcome a new Axios/Survey Monkey poll showing five incumbent Senate Democrats losing to specific or unnamed Republicans right now and a few others barely ahead.  They also rip California for brazenly impeding efforts of federal immigration officials and wonder where all the liberal love for states’ rights was when Arizona wanted to enforce federal laws when the federal government refused to do it.  And they swat down a Washington Post columnist for suggesting the U.S. pursue a socialist system and dig deeper into why so many people are not satisfied with the way things are going right now.

Share

The Trouble with Tariffs

by

President Trump’s embrace of new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is largely believed to be behind the exit of his top economic adviser, and one free market advocate is concerned that it could hurt American consumers and stunt the nation’s economic growth spurt.

Last week, during a meeting with executives from America’s leading steel and aluminum manufacturers, Trump announced his new policy.

“We’ll be imposing tariffs on steel imports and tariffs on aluminum imports.  Pretty much all of you will be immediately expanding if we give you that level playing field, if we give you that help,” said Trump in announcing 25 percent tariffs on steel imports and a 10 percent surcharge on foreign aluminum.

The policy comes as little surprise, since Trump routinely condemned what he characterized as terrible trade policies with the likes of China and Japan and vowed to revive American manufacturing by addressing America’s trade posture.

However, Texas Public Policy Foundation Senior Economist Dr. Vance Ginn believes tariffs are the wrong policy for Trump to pursue.

“I think this would be bad for Americans overall and reduce our economic potential over time, which had been boosted by the tax cuts last year and the regulatory reforms that were made.  I’d rather see those sorts of things boosted instead of tariffs and trade practices such as this,” said Ginn.

Ginn says the simple fact is that charging more more imports means higher prices for all of us.

“If you raise the cost of doing business, that hurts business and it hurts American consumers.  Whenever you look at raising steel prices and aluminum prices, those are in the cars that we drive and the buildings where we work and in many other aspects of capital throughout our economy,” said Ginn.

He also says we were reminded just last decade in the George W. Bush administration that steel tariffs don’t necessarily get the intended results.

“Some estimates show that cost us about 200,000 jobs.  I would hate to see more Americans not have a job when we’ve had an expanding economy,” said Ginn.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross estimates that the steel tariffs would result in a bump of one half of one percent to three-quarters of one percent, an average of about $700.  He says the difference is “trivial.”

Ginn says that approach badly undermines the administration’s defense of the tax cuts.

“If $1,000 is just crumbs according to Nancy Pelosi but a big deal according to those in favor of the tax cuts, $700 is also a big deal.  That takes away a lot of the potential from those bonuses that they had before to [add income],” said Ginn.

But with significant trade deficits and China dumping steel into this country in violation of World Trade Organization protocols, the U.S. stands at a tactical disadvantage.

Ginn says that doesn’t explain why the tariffs apply to everyone.

“The proposal so far would be a global tariff on steel and aluminum.  It wouldn’t just hit China.  So if there are those issues with China, let’s deal with those, not necessarily make it for everyone to pay these higher costs,” said Ginn.

Ginn also says the effort to reduce our trade deficits starts with a tough look in the mirror.

“Let’s look at what we’re doing here at home that’s also maybe raising the cost of living and raising the cost of doing business such that China and other countries are having a competitive advantage in the global market,” said Ginn.

“Let’s look at the cost of unions and what they’re doing to the cost of labor over time.  Let’s look at our minimum wage and what that’s doing over time.  Retirement pensions.  There are a number of factors that are raising the cost here that are putting us at a disadvantage compared to other countries,” said Ginn.

Ginn believes America’s position on the global trading stage is already on the upswing thanks to the tax reform bill.

“That helps to reduce the cost of doing business.  It allows us to be more competitive on a global playing field.  I think we should look at more of those things, along with regulatory reforms,” said Ginn.

According to Ginn, the way to help an economy flourish is not to add more complications but to remove as many as possible.  He says it’s led to a booming economy in Texas.

“The ability for us to focus on freedom and free markets has allowed us to be a powerhouse.  As an independent nation, we would be the tenth largest economy in the world and continue to create a lot of jobs.  In fact, over the last decade, we created 26 percent of all new jobs that were added in the United States,” said Ginn.

President Trump’s negotiating tactics often show him throwing out an idea, watching his critics set their hair on fire, and then finding common ground with a less severe approach.  Ginn suspects that is Trump’s approach here, as well as an effort to put the heat on officials renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

“He’s even talked to the Mexicans and the Canadians and said, ‘Look, if we don’t get something done with NAFTA, then I’m definitely going through with these tariffs.’  That puts pressure on the NAFTA renegotiation process as well.  I’m hopeful this is not where we’ll be at the end of the day,” said Ginn.

Ginn contends NAFTA could be much better but is not as destructive to the U.S. economy as its critics suggest.  He says free trade ought to be the ultimate goal.

“What would be a perfect trade agreement?  It would be no trade barriers between the countries that are involved.  Instead, we have a 1,700-page trade agreement with NAFTA.

“So what does that do?  That picks winners and losers throughout the whole economy.  There’s a lot of ways to renegotiate to make this more of a free trade agreement.  I’m just a little concerned that’s not where we’re going to go if we start picking out even more winners and losers in the process,” said Ginn.

Standard Podcast [ 10:15 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Blue Wave Meets Texas, Cohn Leaves White House, Libs Want to Take Your Cars

by


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are fully aware that Democrats may have a good year in the midterms but Tuesday’s primary results suggest the Democrats still have a long way to go in Texas.  However, they don’t like the departure of chief Trump economic adviser Gary Cohn and they really don’t like that Trump’s surprise announcement on new tariffs is the reason for it.  And they confront a growing trend on the left demonizing people for driving or even having cars.  Jim points out it’s because urban liberals cannot fathom that anyone lives a different way than they do and Greg suggests that when lefties decide they don’t want something then no one else is allowed to have it either.

Share

What ‘Solutions’ Will Stop Mass Shootings?

by

Gun control activists and a growing number of Republicans insist something must be done to address gun violence but one of the leading researchers on guns says the data prove the gun control proposals getting discussed will not stop future atrocities but ideas getting shouted down by Democrats and the media would make a difference.

More and more Republicans are urging action by Congress, from universal background checks to denying people on the No Fly List from purchasing guns.  Some aren’t even sure what they want but insist something needs to get passed and President Trump needs to lead on the issue.

“You have an obligation to give us a package to consider, regarding school safety and guns.  You did a good job talking in front of the country about the problem,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

“Propose something, Mr. President, and I think Republicans have an obligation to work with Democrats to make it law if we can,” added Graham.

Crime Prevention Research Center President Dr. John Lott has studied gun and crime data for decades.  He is not impressed by the generic demand for action.

“I’m very frustrated by this whole debate myself.  What makes me even more frustrated is the fact that the types of solutions that are being offered have really nothing to do with stopping these types of mass public shootings,” said Lott.

Lott then took aim at ideas like expanded background checks and banning so-called assault weapons, explaining why he thinks they would’t work.

“The number one solution that Democrats go to all the time are the background checks on private transfers of guns.  If that type of law had been in effect, it wouldn’t have stopped any mass public shooting this century or even years before that.  And yet they keep pushing it,” said Lott.

He says the statistics on “assault weapons” are also unconvincing.

“To go and ban guns based on how they look really never made much sense to me and there’s a lot of academic research that shows that it had no impact on these types of crimes,” said Lott.

Many conservatives recoiled last week when President Trump seemed warm to ideas ranging from raising the minimum age for purchasing rifles to expanded background checks and possibly even portions of an “assault weapons” ban.

Lott says people need to remember how Trump approaches policy and adds he will not judge Trump until he sees concrete proposals.

“I don’t put too much weight on any one part of the conversation.  I want to see what comes out in the end, but Trump is a very practical person.  You can’t go and argue with him, I don’t believe, just saying this is a right.

“I don’t think that’s the way he thinks about things.  He wants to know what will work, what will stop these types of things,” said Lott.

Lott is very pleased Trump seems to be on board with allowing teachers and staff voluntarily conceal carry on school property.  He also applauds Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., for introducing legislation to repeal the federal gun-free zones.

He says the research shows those zones are magnets for deranged killers.

“I don’t know how somebody can get around it.  You read the diaries, you read the other statements these killers leave, they’re very explicit on why they picked the targets that they do.  Over 98 percent of the mass public shootings since 1950 have occurred in places where guns are banned,” said Lott.

Politicians in both parties recoil at the idea of teachers and school staff voluntarily carrying guns, with some preferring armed security instead.  Lott says that’s not nearly as effective.

“Putting somebody in uniform is like putting someone there with a neon sign that says ‘Shoot me first,'” said Lott.  “If it’s concealed (on staff or teachers), the attackers won’t even know who they have to worry about.  It takes away the strategic advantage that these killers have.”

But is there any evidence that arming faculty and staff will work?

“It varies a lot across states but there are 25 states that allow staff and teachers to carry to varying degrees.  There’s never been an attack at one of those schools,” said Lott.

Of course, mass shootings don’t only happen in schools, and Lott says concealed carry is also the best defense of those settings as well.

“We have 17 million Americans in this country who have a concealed carry permit.  They’re at the malls.  They’re at the restaurants, at the movie theaters, at the grocery stores.  You have no clue whether somebody next to you has a concealed carry permit or not.

“If you take out California and New York, over eight percent of the adult population in the rest of the country has a concealed carry permit.  It’s very likely when you’re just going around that there are people there who have a gun.  You’d only know if something bad happened,” said Lott.

Standard Podcast [ 12:37 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share