• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About

Radio America Online News Bureau

Senate

‘This Is A Rescue Effort’

June 22, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/6-22-turner-blog.mp3

Senate Republican leaders revealed their closely guarded health care bill on Thursday, predictably outraging Democrats and leaving some conservative senators insistent that the bill doesn’t go far enough.

Known officially as the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017, the legislation kills Obamacare’s individual mandate, scraps many of the current taxes on the books, and gives more power to the states to define the health care market.

On the flip side, the bill increases subsidies over what House Republicans approved last month and offers a slower phasing out of Medicaid expansion.  Both plans keep the Obamacare provisions of forbidding insurance companies from rejecting patients with pre-existing conditions and allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ policies until age 26.

Some of the top conservative health care policy leaders are effusive in their praise.  Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity President Avik Roy says, “If it passes, it’ll be the greatest policy achievement by a GOP Congress in my lifetime.”

Galen Institute President Grace-Marie Turner also likes the plan, noting that it addresses the four areas she believes must be dealt with as a result of Obamacare’s many problems.  Specifically, she says any final product must provide a safety net, create a bridge to new coverage, allow states greater flexibility on regulations, and reform Medicaid.

“This bill does all four of those key things,” said Turner.  “Yes the Senate moves the dials in slightly different ways and they learned from the reaction to the House bill, particularly in the way the refundable tax credits were structured for people who need help in purchasing coverage.”

Turner admits the Senate bill spreads taxpayer dollars around more liberally than the House plan.

“Young people, people that are in lower income categories and people (nearing) Medicare age will get more help than they would have through the House bill,” said Turner.

That approach extends to Medicaid as well.

“It gets back to a more normal way of spending the federal-state match for Medicaid spending, but it does it over a longer period of time.  So the states have more time to adjust to reductions in their Medicaid payments,” said Turner.

“But they are also going to have a lot more flexibility with this bill than they would have otherwise had.  Obamacare just basically added millions more people to a faltering Medicaid program instead of building in reforms,” she added.

While many on the right see the legislation as a significant improvement over the status quo, some changes must be made if Republican leaders want the votes needed to pass it.  Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Mike Lee, R-Utah, Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, and Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., say they cannot back the bill in its present form because it doesn’t do what the GOP promised to do the past four election cycles.

“Currently, for a variety of reasons, we are not ready to vote for this bill, but we are open to negotiation and obtaining more information before it is brought to the floor,” the senators said in a joint statement.

“There are provisions in this draft that represent an improvement to our current healthcare system but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise that we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their healthcare costs,” they added.

Turner says she is encouraged by the language of the statement and expects their concerns to result in a stronger bill.

“I think the leadership knows they are going to have to make tweaks and adjustments to this bill.  Fortunately, we’re now sort of out of the policy realm and we’re in the vote-buying realm.  ‘What do you need, Sen. Paul?  What do you need Sen. Johnson, etc. to be able to vote for this bill,” said Turner.

“We saw on the House side they made it better when people started to push back strongly,” said Turner.

She also says the underlying arguments from the four senators are spot on but she says the parameters for moving this legislation make things more complicated.

“They are right that we’ve got to do more to get costs down and to give people more choices.  But they’re also so constrained by this process they have to go through, this reconciliation process, to be able to pass this with 51 votes, means that everything in the bill has to directly pertain to federal spending and federal taxation,” said Turner.

“That means that it’s really hard to get to the regulatory structures through this bill, which is why I think we need to think about this as a first step – breaking the logjam – so we can begin a process of making changes that effect this one-sixth of our economy so that we can begin to move forward to give people the choices that they want.  but we can’t do it on the Obamacare platform,” said Turner.

Turner says with Medicare and Medicaid on the books, the conservative goal of wrenching health care away from the clutches of government will remain just that.  However, she says the key provisions allowing more latitude to the states is a major step in the that direction.

“There’s always going to be a federal footprint.  The question is whether it’s Bigfoot and it crushes the health sector or whether it has an appropriate footprint of helping people in need while allowing the private market to work,” said Turner.

The greatest howls of protest came from Democrats, who denounced the bill as cruel and likely to kill many people the moment it was released.

“That sort of tells me they were against it before they even knew what was in it,” said Turner.

While fully aware of the partisan divide in Washington and the Democrats’ intention to defend President Obama’s signature domestic achievement, Turner is stunned that Democrats are fine with what Obamacare is doing to health care right now.

“Are they really defending Obamacare, that has caused health insurance costs to double for an individual since the year before this law was passed, 140 percent higher for families.  You have many counties that are at risk of having no options for people to use.  Obamacare has not worked,” said Turner.

“There have been no changes in any meaningful way, other than one regulation, for the Trump administration or this Congress to precipitate this.  This is failing of its own right,” said Turner.

Given the current numbers in the Senate, Turner believes this legislation is about the best the GOP can do on its own and that lawmakers must act.

“This is a rescue effort and they’ve got to get this done,” she said.

Standard Podcast [ 11:26 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Medicaid, news, Obamacare, Senate, taxes

‘You Said It’s What You’re Going to Do’

June 13, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/6-13-cuccinelli-blog.mp3

Senate Republican leaders are not offering an specifics on their health care reform bill but reports of critical concessions in at least three major areas leave skeptical conservatives worried that years worth of Obamacare repeal promises are wilting before our eyes.

In recent weeks, reports have described the difficulty of Republicans in cobbling together 50 or 51 votes to advance an Obamacare overhaul.  As a result, leaders are reportedly considering a more generous approach to Medicare expansion, effectively adopting the Obamacare approach to people with pre-existing conditions and, most recently, allowing tax payer funding of Planned Parenthood to continue.

Former Virginia Attorney General and current Senate Conservatives Fund President Ken Cuccinelli says efforts to make everyone happy appear to have taken any meaningful teeth out of the legislation.

“I’m concerned anytime (Senate Majority Leader) Mitch McConnell is talking the way he is.  A deal to Mitch McConnell to you and me means capitulation,” said Cuccinelli, who was also the 2013 Republican nominee for Virginia governor.

He says if McConnell embraces a badly watered-down bill, he is breaking promises he clearly made while running for re-election in 2014.

“I remember, ‘Root and branch.  We’re going to pull it out root and branch,'” said Cuccinelli, mimicking McConnell’s 2014 declaration.  “[He ] paid for over 30,000 anti-Obamacare ads in October alone for his re-election in 2014.  He apparently had no intention of keeping those promises.”

But it wasn’t just McConnell.  Every Republican senator has campaigned on addressing Obamacare, with the vast majority vowing to repeal and replace the 2010 law.  What has changed now that the GOP is in a position to do something about it?

“A lot of them lie.  That’s the sad truth that is now being brought home to us,” said Cuccinelli, who also has no use for the argument that dealing with Obamacare is far more complex than a simple repeal vote.

“They love to tell us how complicated it is.  What that means is, ‘You’re stupid and I’m the smart senator.  You don’t know what you’re talking about so you should just adopt my soft, unprincipled position that, oh by the way, is not what I campaigned on,'” said Cuccinelli.

“It’s demeaning to the American people.  It’s patronizing.  It’s elitist and it’s a lie,” said Cuccinelli.

Rather than try to mollify every critic, Cuccinelli says there’s a much simpler way for lawmakers to proceed – do what they promised voters they would do.

“They didn’t say, ‘We’re going to undo parts of it.’  They didn’t say, ‘This is complicated and I’m going to simplify it.’  They said they were going to repeal it.  There was a good article by one of the Fox (News) contributors a little while ago about simply doing what you say you’re going to do.

“Will some people not like it?  Yeah, some people will not like it, but you said it’s what you were going to do,” said Cuccinelli.

Cuccinelli points to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s controversial effort to ease the grip of unions on state government as an example of honoring your word in a tough environment.

“We saw the largest protest in the state capital we have ever seen, 100,000 people.  They physically shut the place down with their obstruction.  Scott Walker and the Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature soldiered on and did what they said they would do,” said Cuccinelli.

He says the voters ultimately rewarded that consistency when opponents were able to put a recall election on the ballot.

“Guess what?  The people who had been largely silent, the people of Wisconsin, came back out and returned Scott Walker to office with essentially the same margin as his first election.  He got re-elected again three years after that,” said Cuccinelli.

“The moral of the story is even when people disagree with you, they respect it when you keep your word, even when it’s hard,” said Cuccinelli.

While the House has passed a bill, Cuccinelli says it also is not what voters were promised.  He says President Trump’s biggest mistake was to let GOP leaders lead the process.

“One of the mistakes…was for the White House to turn this over to (House Speaker) Paul Ryan.  What they got was a donor bill.  They did not get a repeal bill.  That’s what the House leadership does.  They caucus with donors,” said Cuccinelli.

Contending that repealing the burdensome regulations in Obamacare is of top priority, Cuccinelli points out that the House bill only address one and a half out of 24 key regulations in the law.

Cuccinelli was the first attorney general in the United States to challenge the Affordable Care Act in court after it was passed into law.  He doesn’t understand why Republicans in Washington don’t just vote on a full repeal.

“They ought to put a real repeal bill up and have a vote.  If you lose Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, that’s still 50 (votes).  And Rand Paul will vote for a real repeal.  He just won’t vote for the other junk.  Then the vice president can break that tie,” said Cuccinelli.

He also says it’s not out of the question for vulnerable Democrats up for re-election in red states next year to get on board.

Cuccinelli and other conservatives balked at the original version of the House’s American Health Care Act, or AHCA.  Most conservatives only got on board after amendments were added to ensure premiums would not increase, even in the short term.

Cuccinelli sees a lot of the same problems emerging in the Senate.

“If we get to an insurance situation instead of a mandate situation, then the bill may be OK.  But if you’re having community rating and forcing pre-existing conditions, it’s not insurance any longer.  It’s a welfare program, which is what Obamacare is right now.

“Until they move it from a welfare program to insurance, where risk is assessed and priced and the market can determine where people land, then it’s not going to be an acceptable bill,” said Cuccinelli.

And would these concessions impact costs to consumers?

“It isn’t going to lower premiums, critically.  All the while, Obamacare is crashing around their ears.  It’s amazing.  How destroyed does this concept have to be until they reject it.  This is classic government.  ‘If it’s broke, do more of what you did before,'” said Cuccinelli.

The reported consideration allowing taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood would be designed to assuage Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.  Cuccinelli says Murkowski’s stand on this component is particularly galling.

“Lisa Murkoswki has been against funding Planned Parenthood during her campaigns and has viciously fought for it after she’s elected.  This is not the first time for Sen. Murkowski to lie to Alaskans about this and to flip back to her pro-abortion position,” said Cuccinelli, asserting no one with that record should be a chairman in a GOP-run Senate.

 

Standard Podcast [ 12:21 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Cuccinelli, news, Obamacare, repeal, Republicans, Senate

‘They Have to Do It By September’

June 5, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/6-5-turner-blog.mp3

Republicans in the Senate have been pouring cold water on expectations of producing a health care reform bill anytime soon, but a leading health care expert says the GOP realistically has just over three months to get it done.

“If they’re going to do this with only 51 votes in the Senate, they have to do it by September,” said Galen Institute President Grace-Marie Turner.  “Frankly, I think they want to do it before the August recess so that they can get on with the rest of the agenda.”

The can officially start working on the bill now that House leaders have finally sent it to the upper chamber.  It was on hold while lawmakers waited on the Congressional Budget Office scoring of the bill to make sure their calculations on how the legislation would impact the deficit were accurate.  They were.

Despite moderate Republicans like Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Dean Heller, R-Nevada, saying the House bill was a non-starter for them, Turner suspects the final Senate version will end up looking pretty familiar.

“They will make some changes to the House bill and they will very much call it their own, but I think a lot of those structural elements of the safety net, the bridge to new coverage, the state flexibility on regulations and the Medicaid reform, I think we’re going to see all of that in there,” said Turner.

She says those four components are critical and are in the House bill: providing help for individual market consumers who no longer have reasonable coverage options, creating a transition to a market-based system, giving states more power to define plans and foster competition and changing Medicaid so it doesn’t devour state resources for all other priorities.

Turner says the House crafted it’s bill with Senate rules in mind.

“The House did try very hard to bend over backwards so that it’s version of the legislation complied with Senate rules,” she said.  “They didn’t want the Senate to have to change it too much.”

Still, Turner does expect the Senate to spend more tax dollars on providing for people with pre-existing conditions.

“The Senate is going to dial things back in different ways and probably provide even more protections than the House bill did for pre-existing conditions protections.  I do think that that has been an inflamed issue that is very much overstated,” said Turner.

“The House bill provided $138 billion to the states to be able to take care of people who have pre-existing conditions and have high health care costs.  All evidence is that would be more than enough to do it,” said Turner.

Turner also suspects the Senate may be less conservative in curtailing Medicaid expansion than the House bill.  And another issue that GOP moderates are likely to fight is the slashing of tax dollars for Planned Parenthood.

With the House bill passing precariously in May, it’s unclear what impact any substantial Senate changes will have on final passage.  But Turner warns the House that whatever they get back from the Senate – if they get anything back from the Senate – may be their one chance to get anything done this year and maybe in this Congress.

“I think everybody knows that whatever the Senate gets through, the House is going to have a very difficult time changing it.  I think it’s very likely going to be take it or leave it,” said Turner.

If we get to that point, Turner suspects voter outrage over the possibility of getting nothing done will likely compel passage of an imperfect bill.

“I don’t think any of them want to go back to the voters in 2018 next year and say, ‘Sorry, for four elections we told you we were going to repeal Obamacare and we just kind of couldn’t figure out how to do it.’  They all know they have to figure out how to do it,” said Turner.

Standard Podcast [ 7:43 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: 2018, AHCA, care, health, house, news, Obamacare, Senate

‘It’s Not Just What I Say, It’s What I Have Done’

May 15, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/5-15-moore-blog.mp3

Republicans in Washington are fiercely lining up behind Sen. Luther Strange in this year’s special election to finish the U.S. Senate term of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and the nation’s best known state judge says he is ready to battle big GOP dollars in the primary and defend the Constitution in Washington.

“I think I can take the values of this state and my particular qualifications to the Senate to help us get this country back to what it should be.  I have had a lot of study in the Constitution of the United States.  I understand it’s meaning and I understand how far away we’ve drifted from that document.  Underlying all of this is virtue and morality which comes from God and we’re trying to deny that God upon which our morality is founded,” said Moore.

Moore is most famous for twice being elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court and effectively removed twice as well.  Moore lost his job the first time in 2003 for refusing to obey a federal court order requiring a Ten Commandments monument to be removed from the court.

In 2015, he was suspended without pay and benefits for telling probate court judges that the Supreme Court decision on marriage did not impact the Alabama Supreme Court’s injunction that preserved marriage as the union of one man and one woman in the state.

Moore says his public stands on those issues tell Alabama voters exactly who they would get as a senator.

“It’s not just what I say.  It’s what I have done.  I have stood for the principles of this state and the people of this state.  I’ve stood against the federal government in a legal manner,” said the 70-year-old Moore.

Moore finds himself in a crowded field for the GOP nomination.  With the filing deadline set for Wednesday, six Republicans are officially in the field.  In addition to Judge Moore and Sen. Strange, the most recognizable name is Rep. Mo Brooks, best known for his work in combating illegal immigration.

Prior to Brooks officially joining the race on Monday, Moore held a 10-point lead over Strange in a poll conducted by Brooks.

The national GOP is coming out with guns blazing against Moore and Brooks and is promising an initial down payment of $2.6 million in advertising on behalf of Strange.

Moore finds it a bit odd that the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, is all-in for a man appointed to the Senate just three months ago.

“He was appointed by the (former) governor and the law provided that an election should be held forthwith, so treating him as an incumbent isn’t exactly what they should be doing,” said Moore, who points out the NRSC’s money plans were announced after Moore got in the race last month.

“They didn’t do it about anybody else but me.  They did it after I announced that I was in the race,” said Moore.  “They restricted consultants.  They imposed large amounts of money for Sen. Strange.  They did it because I’m in the race and they know that I will not follow the agenda of anyone else.  I’ll do what I believe is right under the Constitution and in the sight of the people of this state,” said Moore.

Moore’s comments on consultants refers to the NRSC warning any political operatives that they will never work with the group again if they offer assistance to any of Strange’s rivals.

However, Moore also thinks the NRSC is wasting its money.

“Trying to control the people of Alabama just doesn’t work and it’s futile to do so.  They know better than to be controlled by people in Washington, D.C.  They see me as an outsider.  I recognize I’m not an insider to Washington, D.C.,” said Moore.

Moore is speaking out most strongly on issues like immigration, health care, education, and the military.  However, he says he uses the same approach with everything.

“All the issues that arise in the Senate, whether it be foreign relations, the military, health care, domestic issues, immigration all go back to a basic understanding of what the federal government should do  and what it should not do,” said Moore.

“The tenth amendment, as we know, says the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution or prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or the people.  Yet we see the federal government, particularly in the judicial branch, stepping into state powers like marriage and divorce and dictating issues they have no jurisdiction over,” said Moore.

He cited the Obama administration’s effort to mandate transgender accommodation at all public schools as another example of the federal government trying to usurp power intended for the states to have.

So what did Moore do in response to the Supreme Court’s 2015 marriage decision to get him suspended from the bench?

“I advised the probate judges that they were still under the injunction that was issues by the Alabama Supreme Court and had not been removed.  For that, the opposition said I told the probate judges to disobey a federal court order.  I never did such a thing,” said Moore.

He says there’s a simple explanation for why the Supreme Court’s decision did not apply to Alabama.

“The United States Supreme Court, in Obergefell, did not rule on the Alabama case, did not rule on anything in the Eleventh Circuit.  It rules in the Sixth Circuit, from the states of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee,” said Moore.

He says until the high court rules on Alabama’s case, the injunction stands, although that injunction is not currently being enforced.

On federal policy, Moore says he would demand a full repeal of Obamacare, ripping out common core, which he considers educational “indoctrination.”  The West Point graduate also favors a beefing up of the military and wants to see an end to the nation’s armed forces being used to advance “the homosexual agenda.”

The first Alabama primary is slated for August 15.  The primary runoff will take place September 26.  The final election will be held December 12.

Standard Podcast [ 15:47 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Alabama, Brooks, Moore, news, NRSC, Senate, Sessions, Strange

SCOTUS Filibuster Nuked, Haley Stares Down Russia, Bannon Off NSC

April 6, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/3-Martini-Lunch-4-6-17.mp3

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America react to Senate Republicans nuking the filibuster rule on Supreme Court nominations.  They also cheer Nikki Haley for staring down the Russians over Syria’s use of chemical weapons against its own people.  And they discuss the removal of Steve Bannon from a key National Security Council position.

Standard Podcast Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Bannon, filibuster, Haley, Martini, National, NSC, nuclear, Review, russia, Senate, Syria

‘One Way or Another, He Will Be Confirmed’

March 23, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/3-23-lee-blog.mp3

One of the Senate’s most conservative members says Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch showed lawmakers and the nation this week why he is a tremendous choice for the high court, while also rejecting the attempts of Democrats to discredit Gorsuch and promising President Trump’s choice will be confirmed.

Thursday was the third marathon day of questions for Gorsuch before the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, was already impressed with Gorsuch but says this week is further evidence Gorsuch belongs on the high court.

Lee says his biggest takeaway from the hearings is the consistency of Gorsuch.

“This judge is the same in every setting in which I’ve interacted with him, whether it’s in a courtroom when I was a lawyer, or whether it’s been in my office as he’s come by in anticipation of his confirmation process, or whether he’s on the hot seat in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he’s been this week,” said Lee, who is a former federal prosecutor and argued cases before Gorsuch at the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“He provides the same answers, the same thoughtful approach.  He doesn’t change from one moment to the next.  He’s considerate of the law.  He has great respect for the Constitution.  That’s exactly the kind of person we need on the Supreme Court,” said Lee.

Democrats spent three days prodding Gorsuch on everything from his own record to how Republicans treated Merrick Garland last year to his political opinions on issues that could come before the court.

Lee says Gorsuch handled the fire well.

“I think he handled every question that was thrown at him with grace and with a great deal of composure, even when things got heated,” said Lee.

Democrats are pursuing a number of strategies to slow down or stall Gorsuch.  That includes a call for a delay on final confirmation until the investigation into alleged ties between Russia and the Trump campaign concludes.

Lee is having none of that.

“I don’t see any reason, as much as some would like to delay this particular vote on him, this is something that doesn’t need to be affected by circumstances,” said Lee.

On Thursday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said he would vote to filibuster Gorsuch and would urge other Democrats to do the same.

Despite that effort, Lee thinks Gorsuch will sail past any filibuster.

“I think he’s going to get through.  I think he’s going to get through with, perhaps, a whole lot of Democratic support.  By the end of the hearing process, it felt like a love-fest, certainly on the Republican side of the aisle.  And I sensed a tone of resignation on the part of some of my Democratic colleagues on the committee,” said Lee.

Democrats changed Senate rules in recent years to kill the filibuster for all nominees except for those tapped for the Supreme Court.  Will Republicans change that rule if Democrats can muster a filibuster?

“Without engaging in hypothetical speculation about exactly what mechanism will be deployed here, I will say this very confidently, we’re going to get Judge Gorsuch confirmed.  One way or another, he will be confirmed,” vowed Lee.

During the hearings, Democrats deployed a number of strategies, starting with the complaint that the Supreme Court seat should already be filled by Judge Merrick Garland.  Garland was nominated by President Obama but Senate Republicans did not hold hearings or votes, contending the next president should get to make the choice.

Lee says it’s time for Democrats to move past the Garland controversy.

“Some of them can choose to be upset if they want to, but I think it would be best for everyone if we focused on what’s before us, what’s happening now rather than what happened a year ago.  If they look at this judge on the basis of his record, I think what they’re going to find is a sincere judge who just wants to find the right answer under the law,” said Lee.

Democrats also tried to get Gorsuch to speak out about his personal opinions on political issues that could wind up before the Supreme Court, including campaign financing and same-sex marriage.

While Gorsuch’s deflections frustrated Democrats, Lee says every nominee has taken the same approach in confirmation in recent years in order to maintain their impartiality.

“The fact that something like that comes up in a judicial confirmation hearing can itself be a cause for recusal if the judge engages in a significant discussion of the issue at hand.  If we’re not careful, this can end up undermining the ability of our Supreme Court justices to do their jobs,” said Lee,

“The fact that Democrats pushed Judge Gorsuch as often as they did, as many times as they did, to wade into as many hot-button controversies as they chose to do doesn’t change the fact this is the standard.  This is the rule and this has been the historical practice,”

In addition to seeking ammunition against Gorsuch, Lee says the political questions expose how Democrats seem to view the courts.

“They’re trying to make something where nothing really exists.  They’re trying to convert the Supreme Court, perhaps, into an organ of public policy making,” said Lee.

Standard Podcast [ 9:20 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: democrats, Gorsuch, Lee confirmation, news, Senate

Lower Health Costs or Pay the Price

March 16, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/3-16-brat-blog.mp3

The House Republican health care bill cleared another hurdle on Thursday, but one of the most fiscally conservative GOP lawmakers says the bill will never pass unless it acts to immediately reduce the cost of coverage and includes repeal of Obamacare’s burdensome regulations.

The House Budget Committee approved the American Health Care Act, 19-17.  Three Republicans voted against it, including Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va.

“The budget committee went forward with it, but some of the guys are getting promises that we’re going to have some fixes and some fairly significant fixes going forward,” said Brat, who believes the Republicans are heading toward disaster on their present course, largely because they don’t address health care costs effectively.

“Both conservative and liberal think tanks and health experts agreed that the current House bill maintains the current structure of Obamacare,” said Brat.  “You keep the individual exchanges. You keep the individual market and you keep the insurance regulations, so I don’t know how anyone expects the price of health care to go down.”

And without lower costs, Brat says Republicans are walking into a political buzz saw with no upside.

“That’s the big thing we have to fix and we all want Trump to be successful.  For him to be successful, we have to make those changes or in a few years we’ll be in another death spiral,” said Brat.  “It’s fairly simple.  Either you lower the price of this thing so people can afford it or else you’re going to pay the price politically.”

He says the key to driving costs down is to address insurance regulations, a priority President Trump has been pushing for months.

“Our leadership bill has prices going down 10 percent after three years.  So we’ve got price increases coming.  We’ve got to make sure that does not happen.  The biggest way you can prevent that is to get at the insurance regulations,” said Brat.

There’s also the issue of choosing what’s in a plan.  For example, Brat notes that because of the many requirements Obamacare mandates in every approved health plan, it’s impossible for young, healthy people to buy low-cost, high-deductible catastrophic plans.

GOP leaders currently argue that market-based reforms would be included in separate legislation from the first bill which deals mainly with taxation and mandates.  That’s the third phase of replacing Obamacare.  They also say regulatory repeal is not in the bill because Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price can roll those back unilaterally.  That is phase two.

Brat is not impressed.

“The problem there is it’s not permanent.  We’ll have this kind of bumper pool every four years, when you switch administrations you’ll change health care for the whole country.  We want that that bucket number two, that Price is going to take care of, to be put into the bill itself,” said Brat.

He says allowing greater competition for coverage and including regulatory reform in the bill could salvage the legislation for many conservatives.

“I think if leadership goes forward with that and pushes it over to the Senate, that’ll get a lot of people to ‘yes.’  That could be the sweet spot,” said Brat.

How will this play out in the coming weeks?  Brat says Trump is the key.

“I don’t think we’re even close to having the votes, so Trump will come in and negotiate and put his foot down on a system that he wants.  He wants to increase competition across state lines and to reduce the costs for everybody so it’s affordable.  If we can get it done in a month or two, it can be signed, sealed and delivered if we can zap these insurance regulations,” said Brat.

He says those components would also allow Republicans, who ran on repealing and replacing Obamacare, to make good on their promises to the American people.

“We can put [a bill] together brick by brick but the key is you’ve got to start out with the glue.  Repeal, that was the promise.  Then move forward from that and build a scaffolding up from there,” said Brat.

“You want to start with free markets and then add a safety net.  You don’t want to start with socialism and then promise free markets later.  That never happens,” said Brat.

So why haven’t these ideas been in the bill from the start?  Brat suspects quite a few GOP senators are looking to dodge controversial votes.

“The Senate has become kind of a high noon tea society over there.  They’re not taking tough votes.  They don’t want this bill to come over in the first place.  I think they’re using that as a way to duck.  Even our side uses that as a way to duck from pushing through what we have to get through,” said Brat.

Brat also rejects the leadership’s argument that market reforms and regulatory repeal can’t be included in a reconciliation process.  He says that’s just not true.  He says the Senate can simply vote to determine if a provision is tax or budget-related.

He says getting this major overhaul done and done right is a matter of political will, and adds that not is the time to demonstrate that will.

“Let’s roll the TV cameras in there.  Let’s put that live in front of the American people so they can see the process of their own government at work for them, and I think we’ll have a big win,” said Brat.

Standard Podcast [ 11:18 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Brat, care, costs, health, house, news, Obamacare, regulations, Senate

Three Martini Lunch 2/17/17

February 17, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/3-Martini-Lunch-2-17-17.mp3

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America discuss reports that intelligence officials and the FBI have not found any criminal activity thus far by Mike Flynn after reviewing transcripts of his call to Russia and testimony to the FBI.  They also react to Thursday’s high-octane press conference as Trump and the media clashed again.  And they rub their hands with glee as Ted Nugent says he’s considering a run for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat.

Standard Podcast [ 21:46 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Flynn, Kid, Martini, media, Michigan, National, Nugent, Review, Rock, Senate, Trump

Three Martini Lunch 2/15/17

February 15, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/3-Martini-Lunch-2-15-17.mp3

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America react to the IRS reportedly ignoring whether taxpayers failed to purchase health insurance in 2016.  They also discuss the latest revelations surrounding Mike Flynn and the leaking to the media by career national security personnel.  And they discuss the early speculation that Kid Rock may be recruited to run for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

Standard Podcast [ 21:51 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: Flynn, intelligence, IRS, Kid, leaks, mandate, Martini, National, Obamacare, Review, Rock, Senate

‘Making Decisions Based on What the Law Says’

February 9, 2017 by GregC

http://dateline.radioamerica.org/podcast/2-9-cuccinelli-blog.mp3

Former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli says the confirmation of Jeff Sessions means we will once again have a Justice Department that follows the law and he says the way Democrats treated Sessions could mean fewer of them in the Senate after the 2018 elections.

After eight years of Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch running the Justice Department, Cuccinelli says Sessions will be a breath of fresh air.

“Simply making decisions based on what the law says would be a radical change at the Department of Justice, as would the appearance of justice,” said Cuccinelli, who served four years as the top law enforcement official in Virginia.

While hoping to see many changes compared to the Obama years, Cuccinelli says one of Sessions’ top goals should be to stop federal agencies from granting themselves power that the law does not grant them.

“They have to stop backing up executive agencies, including the department itself, in expanding the law.  They need to focus on containing government within the law.  That includes everything from silly stuff like transgender bathrooms being covered by gender discrimination all the way up to agencies attempting to create new regulatory arenas for themselves and this vastly increase their power,” said Cuccinelli.

President Trump has already talked about his desire to roll back the ability of the government to grab more power.  But Cuccinelli says that effort really needs to be rooted at the Justice Department.

“The legal oompf for all of that comes from the Department of Justice and having Sessions there – someone who’s committed to the rule of law and to reining in the federal government and not using it to exercise power – is going to be a very welcome change,” said Cuccinelli.

One specific area Cuccinelli expects to see great improvement in is the Justice Department’s relationship with law enforcement.

“These are people going to bat to protect you and me who have not had the back of the government.  Frankly, it’s been the opposite.  They’ve had to worry about getting prosecuted just for doing their job.  That day is over thanks to the ascension of Jeff Sessions as the attorney general,” said Cuccinelli.

However, Cuccinelli reminds Sessions and all Americans that attorney general is different than every other cabinet position.

“When it comes to matters of policy, the attorney general does what the president wants.  When it comes to matters of law, the attorney general does what the law dictates regardless of what the president wants,” said Cuccinelli.

“As opposed to what we’ve seen for the past eight years, I am confident that Sessions is going to be an attorney general who is actually going to uphold both sides of that deal for the American people,” said Cuccinelli.

On Wednesday, Sessions was confirmed by the Senate on a 52-47 vote.  Only Sen. Joe Manchin, D-WV, crossed the aisle to back Sessions.

The confirmation process featured heated debate, including Democratic Sen. Cory Booker, D-NJ, telling the Senate Judiciary Committee that Sessions should be rejected for his record on race and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was booted from the debate for allegedly disparaging Sessions in her floor speech.

Cuccinelli says the vitriol coming from Democrats is telling.

“They’re playing to a rabid left-wing base that is wildly out of touch with just ordinary Americans,” said Cuccinelli, who says the Democrats never found substantive reasons to oppose Sessions.

“There’s just nothing that they can point to other than generating their own allegations for complaints.  He is a nice guy.  He is an intelligent individual.  He believes what he believes and that is somewhat different than the lefties there.  Nonetheless, the way he conducts himself even in those situations has never given any of them cause for complaint before,” said Cuccinelli.

He believes Booker and Warren lodged their fierce protests for the sake of their own self-promotion.  He notes Booker recently lavished praise on Sessions in public after they worked together, but then turned and accused Sessions of being racially biased.

“I don’t care what the project is.  If I think you’re a racist, I will never stand next to you and tell the world what a great guy you are,” said Cuccinelli.

Cuccinelli is also president of the Senate Conervatives Fund, which recruits and contributes to conservative U.S. Senate candidates.  The group has frequently clashed with establishment Republicans and the national party, but right now Cuccinelli sees great opportunities as Democrats have to defend the vast majority of Senate seats in 2018.

“I fully expect Republicans to gain seats.  The only question is how many.  The biggest targets of them all are going to be Democrats in states that President Trump won,” said Cuccinelli.

Three years after narrowly losing the governor’s race in Virginia, Cuccinelli will not be a Senate candidate against Tim Kaine in 2018.  However, he believes the 2016 Democratic vice presidential nominee is vulnerable too.

“This is an eminently winnable state and Sen. Kaine has really accomplished nothing and has become more radicalized, certainly much more so than the average voter in Virginia, than his time in the Senate,” said Cuccinelli.

Standard Podcast [ 10:10 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share

Filed Under: News & Politics, Podcasts Tagged With: attorney, Cuccinelli, democrats, Department, general, justice, news, Senate, Sessions

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • …
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent

  • GOP Senate Prospects, Cable News Debate Drama, Lightfoot Fails Upward
  • Senate’s Student Loan Rebuke, ‘No Plan’ on China, Hunter’s Absurd Defense
  • Manchin’s Dismal Polling, Trump-DeSantis Surrogate Wars, Christie Crashes the Party
  • Debt Ceiling Deal, EU vs. Twitter, Neuralink’s Promise vs. Peril
  • A Memorial Day Special

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in