Chatting before the much-anticipated Senate vote to end the government shutdown, Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are glad to see Democrats feeling the heat on refusing to fund the government and taking some steps to get things fully up and running, but they also warn listeners what Democrats and some Republicans really want in an immigration bill to go along with reopening the government. They also don’t believe the FBI’s explanation that it somehow lost five critical months worth of text messages from Peter Strzok, the agent fired form the Mueller special counsel team and bragged about an “insurance policy” against a Trump victory. And they also call BS on the explanation from Sen. Rand Paul’s neighbor for attacking Paul, namely that the senator was assaulted from behind and had five ribs broken because he was stacking brush close to their shared property line.
Trump Hails March for Life, Highlights Pro-Life Policies
Donald Trump became the first sitting president to address the March for Life on camera Friday, hailing the pro-life activists for their love and concern for the unborn and their mothers and announcing new pro-life policies impacting conscience protections for the medical community and flexibility for how states spend Medicaid dollars.
On a sunny Friday that was considerably warmer than most recent days in the nation’s capital, tens of thousands of pro-life demonstrators descended on the National Mall to hear speeches from President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, lawmakers, and other activists before marching to the U.S. Supreme Court to denounce the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions handed down 45 years ago this month by the nation’s highest court.
Those decisions legalized abortion across America, giving women protection under the law to terminate their unborn children for any reason at virtually any point in their pregnancies.
The March for Life began soon after, but for the first 44 years no president addressed the crowd in person.
That changed on Friday.
“Today I’m honored and really proud to be the first president to stand with you here at the White House to address the 45th March for Life,” said Trump.
Trump spoke from the Rose Garden at the White House. Video was then transmitted to giant screens on the National Mall. Previous pro-life presidents spoke to the march through phone calls.
Vice President Pence introduced Trump as the most pro-life president in U.S. history. Trump says protecting life is a major priority of his administration.
“Under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence and that is the right to life,” said Trump.
Trump then listed multiple policy moves and priorities, starting with an order he issued Friday for the medical community.
“We have just issued a new proposal to protect conscience rights and religious freedoms of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals,” said Trump.
He also announced an end to an Obama administration directive on how states can spend Medicaid dollars.
“I have also just reversed the previous administration’s policy that restricted states’ efforts to direct Medicaid funding away from abortion facilities that violate the law,” said Trump.
States may now have the flexibility to refuse sending taxpayer dollars to the likes of Planned Parenthood. In 2016, the Obama administration warned states that refusing abortion providers that money may be a violation of federal law.
Trump also urged the Senate to follow the lead of the House and approve a federal ban on most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. The legislation is known as the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
“I strongly supported the House of Representatives’ pain-capable bill, which would end painful late-term abortions nationwide. And I call upon the Senate to pass this important law and send it to my desk for signing,” said Trump.
Earlier on Friday, the House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. The bill calls for criminal penalties for doctors who fail to treat and care for infants who survive attempted abortions and fully emerge from their mothers.
Penalties include criminal fines and up to five years in prison. Current law requires physicians to care for such babies but does not detail penalties for those who refuse.
The bill passed the House 241-183. All but six Democrats opposed it. All Republicans supported it, however, Democrats are planning to kill the legislation in the Senate.
During his speech, Trump railed against America’s standing as being among the nations with the most radical abortion laws.
“As you all know, Roe v. Wade has resulted in some of the most permissive abortion laws anywhere in the world. For example, in the United States, it’s one of only seven countries to allow elective late-term abortions, along with China, North Korea, and others,” said Trump.
“Right now, in a number of states, the laws allow a baby to be [torn] from his or her mother’s womb in the ninth month. It is wrong. It has to change,” said Trump.
Trump acknowledged the marchers and praised them for keeping the pressure on government for 45 years and counting since Roe v. Wade.
“Today, tens of thousands of families, students, and patriots and really great citizens gather here in our nation’s capital. You come from many backgrounds, many places, but you all come for one beautiful cause: to build a society where life is celebrated, protected, and cherished,” said Trump.
“The March for Life is a movement borne out of love. You love your families, you love your neighbors, you love our nation, and you love every child -born and unborn – because you believe that every life is sacred and that every child is a precious gift from God,” said Trump.
In addition to applauding those who fight to save unborn lives, Trump also praised those who care after women in crisis pregnancies.
“I want to thank every person here today and everyone across our country who works with such big hearts and tireless devotion to make sure that parents have the care and support they need to choose life,” said Trump.
Trump singled out Mariana Donadio of Greensboro, North Carolina. Donadio found herself in a crisis pregnancy when she was 17 years old chose to have her baby with the support of her parents. Now the mother of six, Donadio run Room at the Inn, a facility caring for other women facing unplanned and uncertain pregancies.
“Over the last 15 years, Room at the Inn has provided housing, child care, counseling, education, and job training to more than 400 women.
“Even more importantly, it has given them hope. It shows each woman that she is not forgotten, that she is not alone, and that she now has a whole family of people who will help her succeed.
“That hope is the true gift of this incredible movement that brings us together today. It is the gift of friendship, the gift of mentorship, and the gift of encouragement, love, and support,” said Trump.
He says that spirit is the key to ultimately winning the battle for the right to life in the United States.
“We are protecting the sanctity of life and the family as the foundation of our society. But this movement can only succeed with the heart and the soul and the prayer of the people,” said Trump.
Interior Removes Shutdown Theater, Dems’ Shutdown Hypocrisy, Memo Mania
Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America applaud the Interior Department for announcing open-air memorials and national parks not requiring staffing will stay open in the event of a partial government shutdown, a very different approach than the Obama administration barricading memorials to war veterans to make a political point. They also hammer Senate Democrats for planning to block a bill that would keep the government open and point out the blatant hypocrisy and deception being employed by the Democrats to justify their tactics. And they tell House Republicans that the FISA memo better be a massive bombshell or else the GOP is going to look pretty silly over the hype. They also tell the GOP that if they want it released to the public, they should just vote on it and be done with it.
How Socialism Became ‘Cool’
CNN is under fire for a story this week suggesting Martin Luther King, Jr. speaks to our political discourse today, part because ‘he was a socialist before it was cool,’ a pronouncement that Cold War scholar Dr. Paul Kengor says is a radical departure from what liberals claimed for decades following King’s death and he indicts our education system for anyone thinking socialism is “cool.”
On Monday, in connection with the federal holiday commemorating King’s birthday and his civil rights legacy, CNN’s John Blake wrote a story chronicling three ways that King, “speaks to our time.” The second contention stated that King “was a socialist before it was cool.”
In his piece, Blake cited several known positions that King held, including advocacy for a “universal health care and education, a guaranteed annual income, and the nationalization of some industries,” wrote Blake, noting that King also called for wealth redistribution at times.
Kengor says King’s sentiments on those issues are not new, but he says the left’s willingness to brand King a socialist is a big shift.
“[Blake] said, ‘There was a time in American politics when calling someone a socialist was a slur.’ I would add there was once upon a time in America when if you called Martin Luther King, Jr. a socialist, it was a racial slur. You weren’t allowed to do that,” said Kengor.
Kengor says King’s socialist positions were an issue of fierce debate in the 1980’s during the debate to create a federal holiday in King’s honor. Skeptics of the idea cited their discomfort with some of King’s positions on economic issues, and were roundly condemned as bigots or engaging in McCarthyism.
Since King’s passing, political activists and politicians on both sides of the aisle have suggested that King would support their particular issue. Kengor says the reality is much more complicated. he says on cultural issues, King was rather conservative.
Noting that King talked often about laws being unjust if they violated a person’s conscience, Kengor says he’s pretty confident about where King would line up on some key issues.
“I can’t imagine that he wouldn’t be willing to defend pastors and religious people who want to cite their freedom of religion and freedom of conscience when it comes to begging not to be forced by the state to make a cake for a ceremony that violates their sacred religious beliefs,” said Kengor.
Even on economic issues, Kengor says the King record is mixed.
“I don’t know to what extent we would call him a socialist, because I’ve seen other King statements that aren’t very socialistic. He would definitely be more of a mixed bag in where we would want to place him on which side of the aisle,” said Kengor.
However, Kengor says regardless of where King stood on a variety of economic issues, it is clearly proper to honor the civil rights leader for his leadership and sacrifices for the cause of racial equality.
“We do celebrate him for his racial achievements. That’s really the key point,” said Kengor.
Following the posting of Blake’s story, a Twitter user named Allie Lynn responded by saying, “The Venezuelan people dying because of socialism would probably disagree about their government being ‘cool.'”
Blake then replied saying, “I’m not sure a lot of people would link what’s happening to Venezuela to socialism; in fact everything I’ve read and talking to people from there attributes there collapse to other problems.”
Kengor is appalled, and suggests Blake visit the tomb of the late Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez.
“He can go there and say, ‘You know, sir, what you called twenty-first century socialism, which is even listed at Wikipedia with your name next to it because you coined the frame, it’s not socialism.’ Blake could provide the correctives and explain to the ghost of Chavez and also to the live body of Nicholas Maduro that they’re not actually doing socialism,” said Kengor.
Whether or not Blake was being flippant about socialism being “cool,” many millennials are more favorable towards socialism than capitalism. A majority between ages 18-29 oppose capitalism. A 2016 poll commissioned by the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation found a third of millennials and 28 percent of the full population thought George W. Bush killed more people than Josef Stalin, who some scholars believe murdered 60-70 million of his own people.
Kengor says students are taught well about the horrors of Nazi Germany and the ten million or more slaughtered in the Holocaust, but he believes our children are done a great disservice by not learning about the murderous trail left behind by communism.
“But that’s nowhere near the number that Stalin killed. It’s nowhere near the number that Mao killed. It’s nowhere near the percentage of his population that Pol Pot killed in Cambodia in four years, and on and on and on. They haven’t learned any of this stuff,” said Kengor.
Kengor blames schools, especially universities for ignoring or distorting the truth. However, he also has a firm message for the parents who send their children to such schools.
“Socialism is enjoying a popular resurgence. It’s very sad. That has to do with our colossal failure in education in this country. And people, if you’re sending your kid to one of these colleges where the kid is coming out a socialist and you’re paying the college to do it, shame on you.. Shame on you,” said Kengor.
Joyous Jobs Numbers, Fake News Awards, When Reid Doesn’t Read
Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America celebrate the lowest number of weekly jobless claims since 1973 as yet another sign the economy is on a serious upswing. They also examine the Republican National Committee’s winners for worst fake news in 2017, with a look at the choices and the RNC being unprepared for the traffic on its website. And they call out MSNBC’s Joy Reid for her vile attack on National Review’s David French and for her later retraction of the smear, which proved she never actually read his article in the first place.
‘We Want to Help Create the Next Generation of Responsible Young Adults’
An ambitious new program known as Healing the Wounds is underway to build up and mentor the children of fallen military service members and law enforcement officers, combining the Alaskan wilderness with career and leadership training to last a lifetime, according to its founder.
The year-long program will be geared towards children aged 12-17.
Healing the Wounds President Jeffrey Epstein spent years leading wilderness experiences for families and groups in Alaska and strongly believes the changes he saw in those clients could also do a world of good for young people trying to chart a path forward following the loss of a parent in service to the nation or their community.
“I’d like to roll this out for the children of out nation’s fallen heroes – and that includes both law enforcement and the military – and provide them with the same opportunities, but actually help mentor them with unprecedented opportunities to blossom and lead productive lives,” said Epstein.
“We really want to have an impact. We want to help create the next generation of responsible young adults,” he added. However, he notes that the program will require the total focus of the young people. As a result, they will have no access to cell phones or other gadgets while in Alaska. Communications back home will be for emergencies only.
Epstein says in a world flooded with negativity, he wants Healing the Wounds to focus young people on noble pursuits.
“It’s a solutions-based initiative. We created the organization to focus on what’s possible at a time when so much of society is laser-focused on what’s wrong. We want to build character, self-confidence, and leadership skills,” said Epstein.
And what does that look like?
“This is a 12-month program. We’re going to continue to mentor them through webinars and tutorials and regional gatherings but also we’re going to expose them to a dozen or so potential career paths, and we’re going to support them with a call-in center year-round as well,” said Epstein.
“One of the things we’re looking at doing is setting some type of program where we can send them out into different industries, not just the exposure up front but the internships as they work through the years that they’re affiliated with us so we can help them prepare, plan and gain experience in those different potential career paths,” said Epstein.
Epstein already has one critical supporter of Healing the Wounds – the U.S. Army.
“I was interviewed early on by a news organization and it caught their eye. They said, ‘You know what? We’re so enthusiastic about what you’re trying to do here. Just let us know when you’re funded and when you’re ready to go. We have thousands of teenagers that would be in a position to take advantage of this,'” said Epstein.
Other prominent military figures are also on board, including retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and retired U.S. Army Lt. General William “Jerry” Boykin. Other recent additions to the advisory board include Gold Star mother Karen Vaughn, retired U.S. Army Green Beret Captain Mykel Hawke, and Taya Kyle, widow of Chris Kyle.
But before the program can begin though, Epstein says significant fundraising is needed.
“We’re ready to go. We’re just trying to raise funding and also build membership. We’re trying to develop a national team of people that will come aboard as members. They can be as active as they want to be. They’ll have the potential to advance any ideas they have,” said Epstein, who sets a goal of 90 percent of all donations going directly to Healing the Wounds programs.
And how will Epstein and his colleagues gauge the success of the program in years to come?
“I think the easiest way to measure results is how happy and productive they turn out in the long run,” said Epstein.
More information can be found at healingthewounds.org.
Tax Cuts More Popular, Rough 2018 Forecast, Are Reporters Fit to Serve?
Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America welcome a new poll showing nearly half of Americans hold a positive view of the Republican tax bill and are bullish on the economy, although they are not ready to give Trump and the GOP credit. They also wince as Democrats win a usually safe Republican seat in the Wisconsin State Senate, and Gov. Scott Walker urges GOP members and activists to make sure people know about their significant accomplishments. And they sigh as President Trump’s doctor gives the commander-in-chief a clean bill of health, but White House reporters still ask the physician a litany of repetitive questions about Trump’s mental health and whether he he is fit to serve under the conditions of the 25th Amendment.
Gang of Six Pushes Massive Amnesty
While the media and many politicians focus on President Trump’s verbiage in response to the immigration legislation presented by the “Gang of Six,” one major immigration reform group says the plan itself is nothing but an amnesty push for more than 10 million people.
The Gang of Six is led by Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.
At issue is the effort to provide legal status to young people brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents. In 2012, President Obama unilaterally granted legal status to young people who agreed to sign up with the Deferred Action for Child Arrivals program, or DACA.
President Trump announced in September that he would end the program in March of this year and lawmakers were ostensibly working on a bill to continue granting legal status to DACA enrollees while also tightening some immigration restrictions. Most estimates suggest there are between 800,000-850,000 people impacted by DACA.
Instead, Numbers USA reports the Gang of Six bill extends permanent legal protection to all illegal immigrants who fit the DACA criteria rather than those who actually enrolled and sets them on a path to citizenship.
“They expand DACA to include the entire pool of dreamer illegal aliens. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that that population exceeds three million and is about 3.3 million,” said Numbers USA’s Chris Chmielinski.
In fact, Numbers USA has released a worksheet comparing the Gang of Six bill with a much more conservative plan from house Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, known as the Securing America’s Future Act. It also lines up both plans against President Trump’s immigration reform priorities.
He says there’s a big difference between DACA and everyone who fits under the ‘dreamer’ label.
“When President Obama announced the DACA program, he limited it to folks that entered prior to 2007, had maintained continuous presence until 2012 and were under the age of 31.
“The dreamer population is much, much more broadly defined than that. And again, the Migration Policy Institute estimates that population is about 3.3 million,” said Chmielinski.
So how does the estimate get to 10 million? By opening the doors for the parents of the dreamers.
“It also offers an amnesty for the parents of the dreamers. So if you assume that all the parents have two parents, that’s another 6.6 million. 6.6 million plus and 3.3. million and you’re at 10 million,” said Chmielinski, who says that is clear-cut amnesty even though the parents are not in line for citizenship.
“We define amnesty as anything that allows illegal aliens to stay in the country and work in the United States,” said Chmielinski.
Furthermore, Chmielinski says those parents actually could wind up being rewarded with citizenship.
“Once the dreamers become citizens, they will be able to sponsor their parents under the chain migration laws, because even though they say they address chain migration, they really don’t,” said Chmielinski.
In fact, it’s unclear what immigration enforcement advocates get in exchange for legalizing DACA in the Gang of Six bill. Chmielinski points out the plan does not address chain migration or the visa lottery in any serious way. It does provide almost $1.6 billion for border fencing, but it comes with a massive caveat.
“They appropriate a little funding towards border fencing, but they say that this $1.6 billion they’re assigning can only be used for existing fencing. They’re telling the administration that as part of this deal, you cannot build any new fencing or any new walls. You can only use the money to repair existing fencing,” said Chmielinski.
The Goodlatte bill, in contrast, gives the government broad authority to build new fences and even walls. However, it does not include funding for such projects, meaning lawmakers would have to approve a separate bill to pay for such construction.
Overall, Chmielinski is encouraged by the Goodlatte bill. He says it limits chain migration to an immigrant’s spouse and children, although there is an exception for elderly parents to come over without a path to citizenship so that their children can care for them.
The Goodlatte plan also scraps the visa lottery entirely, makes overstaying a visa a crime and mandates all employers use E-Verify to confirm their new and existing employees are all in the country legally.
Chmielinski also says Goodlatte wants to use cutting edge technology to keep track of who is in the country.
“It requires the implementation of a bio-metric entry-exit system. This is something that was actually passed by Congress in the mid-2000’s as a recommendation of the 9/11 Commission. This is basically a tracking system. Every non-citizen that enters the United States is checked in to the country and then we check them out when they leave, so we know when folks overstay,” said Chmielinski.
The Goodlatte bill seems to have little traction on Capitol Hill right now and the mainstream media have ignored it completely while often hailing the Gang of Six bill. The issue prominent this week as Democrats try to attach legalization of DACA to legislation to keep the federal government running at full capacity.
So what is likely to happen? Chmielinski doesn’t expect much to happen for a few weeks.
“You’ll see a [continuing resolution] passed for about a month. Then over the next three to four weeks, this DACA situation will completely play out. But I think this might be the last time we’re talking about it. I think if nothing’s taken care of over the next month, then nothing will probably happen on it,” said Chmielinski.
DNC Still Adrift, Shutdown Theater Returns, CNN Says Socialism is Cool
Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America enjoy learning that the Democratic National Committee is still mired in chaos and that the liberal establishment and the Bernie Sanders supporters are still feuding more than a year after the 2016 campaign and just months before the midterm elections. They also groan as the threat of a government shutdown looms and some Republicans think they can win the public relations battle, even though the media always pin the blame on Republicans, regardless of the circumstances. And they shred CNN for co-opting the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. to advance progressive environmental policies and for suggesting King was a socialist “before it was cool.”
‘Chasing King’s Killer’
As Americans pause to commemorate what would have been Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s eighty-ninth birthday, a new book chronicles the civil rights leader’s horrific assassination 50 years ago, the harrowing pursuit of his killer, and the legacy he leaves with us today.
James L. Swanson is the author of “Chasing King’s Killer: The Hunt for Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Assassin.” Swanson, who writes of these searing moments in history in the style of a novel, has also written on the assassinations of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy and the pursuit of their assassins.
When it come to King, Swanson says one quality stands out strongest.
“I think Martin Luther King is one of the bravest men in American history, in a way more so than Abraham Lincoln or John Kennedy. Unlike them, Dr. King was under constant threat of death and harassment for over ten years,” said Swanson.
Swanson begins the book by recounting the 1958 attack on King’s life, when a deranged black woman named Izola Ware Curry stabbed King in the heart at a book signing event in Harlem. Later, the FBI kept very close tabs on King, and one official even sent a letter urging King to take his own life before receiving the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize.
The threats didn’t stop there.
“He was threatened countless times with death. His home was bombed. A gun was shot at his house. He was hit with bottles and rocks and stones. He was arrested over 30 times by white sheriffs and policemen,” said Swanson.
Yet, King endured the threats of violence to pursue his dream of Americans being judged on the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
“He could have gone back to private life and lived quietly as a husband, father, and minister at his local church. But he said for this great cause we must all be prepared to die. In fact, when John Kennedy was assassinated, Martin Luther King turned to his wife and said, ‘Well, you know that’s what’s going to happen to me,'” said Swanson.
In 1967, just as King was straining relations with President Johnson over the Vietnam War, a lifelong criminal named James Earl Ray escaped from the Missouri State Penitentiary in the back of a bread truck.
He seemed like the last person to have his name etched permanently in history.
“Ray was a longtime, lifelong loser. He grew up poor in Missouri, almost Civil War-type poverty, didn’t even have shoes at school, dropped out of school. He was a lifelong petty criminal, who came from a generation and forebears of criminals and grifters and chiselers,” said Swanson.
After escaping, Ray went out to California and successfully went unnoticed. He spent the next several months on mundane pursuits such as ballroom dance classes, bartending school.
“He went to find a new life in California like so many lost people in the 1960’s did,” said Swanson. “He went to see gurus and psychologists who would teach him self-awareness and self-improvement. It was an odd life,” said Swanson.
Then, suddenly, after King visited Los Angeles in March 1968, Ray left Los Angeles and headed to the Deep South, apparently determined to kill Dr. King. So what changed?
Ray was certainly a racist, but he wasn’t in the Klan. He had never participated in racial violence. This hidden alarm clock, this hidden signal went off in Ray, almost like he was a hibernating animal. Something triggered him, and he decided to hunt down Martin Luther King,” said Swanson.
“I think he did it to achieve significance. Certainly, he wanted to send the civil rights movement into disarray. But I think his innermost motive was to be somebody, because he had been nobody all of his life,” said Swanson.
Around that time, King was spending a lot of time in Memphis, Tennessee, in support of the city’s striking sanitation workers. Newspaper accounts included a picture of King outside the Lorraine Motel, with his room number – 306 – clearly visible in the picture.
According to the evidence, Ray then rented a room at a boarding house near the Lorraine Motel. From his room, Ray could see King’s room and the balcony outside of it. But he did not have a clear shot from there. He soon discovered that the community bathroom in the boarding house offered the angle he was looking for.
Around 6 p.m. on April 4, 1968, Ray noticed that King was standing alone on the balcony, speaking to associates in the parking lot below. Ray quickly made his way to the bathroom, locked the door, and fired one shot that fatally struck King in the cheek.
A couple of police officers had been quietly observing King, trying to assure his visit to Memphis proceeded smoothly.
“Two of them were in the (nearby) fire station, observing Dr. King from a distance at the Lorraine Motel. They saw him shot. They yelled to each other, ‘Dr. King has just been shot.’ So they ran out of the fire station and ran to the Lorraine Motel to see what was going on,” said Swanson.
While the police rushed to the motel, Ray was making his getaway. But as he approached his car, Ray noticed the patrol cars parked at the fire station. Fearing an officer would see him, Ray quickly ditched his rifle and a suitcase, a decision that eventually provided critical evidence in his capture.
Swanson says Ray may have been captured within minutes if Memphis police had set up roadblocks more swiftly, but a prank call at the worst time delayed those efforts.
“The Memphis police were distracted because a teenager got on a ham radio and pretended to be someone pursuing James Earl Ray in his Mustang. It was all a crank call and it sent police on a wild goose chase for almost an hour,” said Swanson.
Ray slipped out of Tennessee via back roads and eventually wound up in King’s hometown of Atlanta. From there, he abandoned his car and caught a bus, first to Chicago and then to Detroit, where he then slipped in to Canada.
From there, Ray forged a passport and flew to England with hopes of eventually disappearing in Africa. However, the fingerprints from the boarding house and his rifle, along with other evidence, allowed the FBI to track down Ray, with the held of Scotland Yard, just as he was preparing to board a flight.
After initially pleading his innocence, Ray agreed to plead guilty, a move with launched a number of conspiracy theories. Ray alleged that he was doing the bidding of a figure known only as Raoul. Others thought there may have been a government conspiracy or that Ray was targeting King on behalf of white supremacists.
“There were rumors at the time that a rich, racist white man had offered a $50,000 or even a $100,000 reward for the man who killed Martin Luther King. but how could Ray have found out who that man was? How could he have collected the reward?” asked Swanson.
He says the facts of the case lead to an obvious conclusion.
“There is overwhelming evidence that it was certainly James Earl Ray in the window of the boarding house from which the shot was fired. There’s so much evidence that it was certainly James Earl Ray and James Earl Ray did it alone.
“I do believe there’s some evidence that one or two of his brothers might have helped him plot it or, more likely, helped him during the initial phases of his escape.” said Swanson.
However, in the 1990’s, Ray successfully convinced one group of his innocence.
“One of King’s sons (Dexter) went to visit James Earl Ray in prison and said, ‘I believe you. My family believes you. You didn’t kill my father.’ It was one of the greatest con jobs by a lifelong con man,”said Swanson.
“There’s a very disturbing photo of King’s son extending his hand to shake the hand of James Earl Ray. Ray keeps his hands in his pockets and stares at the son. The look on Ray’s face is, ‘Oh, you expect me to shake that black man’s hand?’ You can read it on his face,” said Swanson.
In a speech the night before his assassination in 1968, King told his followers that the movement would reach the “promised land” but admitted he might not be alive to see it.
“He said, ‘I would like a long life but tonight I’m not fearing any man.’ He didn’t know that just a couple of miles away on that stormy night that a man with a rifle was lying in wait in a hotel room and was going to come out the next day and hunt him down and kill him,” said Swanson.
In his voluminous research for the book, Swanson says he came to admire King all the more for his courage and commitment to the cause of equality and justice. He believes that it what Americans should consider on this day.
“He loved America. He didn’t hate America. He thought America had failed to live up to the promise in the Declaration of Independence. He wanted to carry on Abraham Lincoln’s unfinished work and make America a better place,” said Swanson.